From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Eugeny S. Mints" <eugeny.mints@gmail.com>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>, scott.preece@motorola.com
Subject: Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?]
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:34:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060911203442.GF11901@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4505C5F9.4060704@gmail.com>
On Tue 2006-09-12 00:24:25, Eugeny S. Mints wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> >>>I was talking about kernel<->user interface.
> >>me too. PowerOP is inkernel interface but which _allows_ to build various
> >>different kernel<->user interfaces on top of it. This PowerOP _advantage_
> >>allows community to experiment with various kernel<->user interfaces
> >>on top
> >
> >Kernel interface is not something to be experimented with.
> it is since current interface (cpufreq in conjunction with
> /sys/power/state, etc) does not address all requirements to the
>interface.
Removing kernel interface takes 2+ years. So no, kernel interface is
not something to be experimented with, at least not on mainline.
> >Actually that's good idea. Submit powerop without doing _any_ kernel
> >interface changes, so we can see that it makes sense...
> It was submitted this way several times.
So try again, and cc lkml this time.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-11 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 149+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-11 7:57 community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?] Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-11 8:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 9:47 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-11 19:36 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 19:53 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-11 20:06 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 20:09 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 20:33 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-11 21:06 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 21:50 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-11 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 3:31 ` Greg KH
2006-09-12 8:26 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-13 4:22 ` David Brownell
2006-09-11 20:25 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-11 21:02 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 3:26 ` Greg KH
2006-09-11 22:00 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-11 22:08 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-11 20:24 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-11 20:34 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-09-13 4:54 ` David Brownell
2006-09-13 11:39 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-09-14 9:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 9:16 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 9:20 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-14 10:05 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-14 10:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 10:47 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-14 10:47 ` [linux-pm] " Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-14 12:15 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 13:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 13:04 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 13:15 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 13:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 13:26 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 14:59 ` David Brownell
2006-09-17 10:53 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-17 13:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-17 13:28 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-17 13:40 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-17 14:14 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-17 18:25 ` community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP[Was: " Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-09-18 9:02 ` community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: " Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 14:56 ` David Brownell
2006-09-17 12:34 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-17 13:06 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-18 10:46 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-18 10:53 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-18 12:01 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-09-18 12:11 ` nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?]] Pavel Machek
2006-09-18 12:42 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-19 18:25 ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-12 20:00 ` nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP] David Brownell
2006-12-13 12:12 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-12-13 21:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-13 21:32 ` David Brownell
2006-12-13 21:44 ` Matthew Locke
2006-12-13 21:53 ` Dave Jones
2006-12-13 22:50 ` Matthew Locke
2006-12-13 22:58 ` Dave Jones
2006-12-14 10:14 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2006-12-14 12:12 ` Dave Jones
2006-12-14 13:01 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-12-14 13:17 ` Dave Jones
2006-12-14 14:56 ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-14 15:22 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2006-12-13 22:55 ` nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements...] David Brownell
2006-12-13 21:56 ` nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP] Eugeny S. Mints
2006-12-13 21:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-13 22:27 ` nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements...] David Brownell
2006-12-13 21:27 ` nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP] Matthew Locke
2006-09-14 19:25 ` community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?] Jon Loeliger
2006-09-17 12:46 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-17 17:32 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-09-19 18:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-19 19:11 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-09-23 23:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 12:12 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 12:35 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-14 9:32 ` PowerOP on lkml or linux-pm? Matthew Locke
2006-09-14 9:45 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 9:58 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-14 9:47 ` community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?] Matthew Locke
2006-09-11 19:30 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-11 19:55 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 20:53 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-11 21:00 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 21:36 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-09-11 21:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 22:41 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-11 23:05 ` cpufreq user<->kernel interface removal [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP] Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 23:50 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-12 3:35 ` Greg KH
2006-09-12 8:41 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-12 17:03 ` Jon Loeliger
2006-09-14 16:26 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-17 12:37 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-17 13:10 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-17 13:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 22:05 ` community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?] Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-11 22:56 ` cpufreq terminally broken [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP] Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 22:56 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 0:17 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-12 3:37 ` Greg KH
2006-09-13 23:50 ` [linux-pm] " David Singleton
2006-09-14 5:30 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 5:30 ` [linux-pm] " Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 5:55 ` OpPoint summary Greg KH
2006-09-14 7:35 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 7:35 ` [linux-pm] " Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 16:55 ` David Singleton
2006-09-14 17:03 ` David Singleton
2006-09-14 17:07 ` David Singleton
2006-09-14 17:25 ` Auke Kok
2006-09-14 17:25 ` Auke Kok
2006-09-14 18:15 ` [linux-pm] " Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 18:17 ` David Singleton
2006-09-17 17:48 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-18 14:33 ` [linux-pm] " Richard A. Griffiths
2006-09-18 16:13 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-18 16:13 ` [linux-pm] " Matthew Locke
2006-09-14 17:11 ` David Singleton
2006-09-17 5:07 ` David Singleton
2006-09-17 12:56 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-17 12:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-17 22:43 ` [linux-pm] " Matthew Locke
2007-02-27 20:55 ` cpufreq terminally broken [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP] David Brownell
2007-02-27 22:41 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-12 8:33 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 8:33 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 9:10 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-12 9:10 ` [linux-pm] " Vitaly Wool
2006-09-12 9:16 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 9:16 ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 9:23 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 15:04 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-14 15:04 ` [linux-pm] " Mark Gross
2006-09-14 14:58 ` Mark Gross
2006-10-05 3:30 ` community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?] Dominik Brodowski
2006-09-11 21:53 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-11 22:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 0:00 ` Mark Gross
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-15 3:00 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-17 12:41 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-15 3:05 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-15 3:16 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-17 12:48 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-25 12:43 Scott E. Preece
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060911203442.GF11901@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=eugeny.mints@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=scott.preece@motorola.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.