From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
Cc: lkml@elf.ucw.cz.kroah.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Preece Scott-PREECE <scott.preece@motorola.com>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: cpufreq user<->kernel interface removal [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP]
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:35:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060912033537.GC27397@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060911235025.GA14234@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:50:25PM -0700, Mark Gross wrote:
> The PowerOP patch has nothing to do with the removal of cpufreq. You
> may be confusing this work with the david signleton patch.
I am totally confused about who is working on what, and what provides
what.
Can someone make quick cheat-sheet that shows the different
developers/companies and projects here? The fact that it's impossible
to keep this straight in the first place does not bode well...
Or, can each of the different projects send a _short_, 1 paragraph, 4
sentance maximum summary of the different things. Think of it as your
"elevator pitch". The different multi-page summaries ware making my
eyes glaze over...
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-12 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 143+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-11 7:57 community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?] Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-11 8:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 9:47 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-11 19:36 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 19:53 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-11 20:06 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 20:09 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 20:33 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-11 21:06 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 21:50 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-11 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 3:31 ` Greg KH
2006-09-12 8:26 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-13 4:22 ` David Brownell
2006-09-11 20:25 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-11 21:02 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 3:26 ` Greg KH
2006-09-11 22:00 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-11 22:08 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-11 20:24 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-11 20:34 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-13 4:54 ` David Brownell
2006-09-13 11:39 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-09-14 9:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 9:16 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 9:20 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-14 10:05 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-14 10:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 10:47 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-14 10:47 ` [linux-pm] " Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-14 12:15 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 13:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 13:04 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 13:15 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 13:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 13:26 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 14:59 ` David Brownell
2006-09-17 10:53 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-17 13:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-17 13:28 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-17 13:40 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-17 14:14 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-17 18:25 ` community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP[Was: " Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-09-18 9:02 ` community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: " Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 14:56 ` David Brownell
2006-09-17 12:34 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-17 13:06 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-18 10:46 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-18 10:53 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-18 12:01 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-09-18 12:11 ` nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?]] Pavel Machek
2006-09-18 12:42 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-19 18:25 ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-12 20:00 ` nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP] David Brownell
2006-12-13 12:12 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-12-13 21:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-13 21:32 ` David Brownell
2006-12-13 21:44 ` Matthew Locke
2006-12-13 21:53 ` Dave Jones
2006-12-13 22:50 ` Matthew Locke
2006-12-13 22:58 ` Dave Jones
2006-12-14 10:14 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2006-12-14 12:12 ` Dave Jones
2006-12-14 13:01 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-12-14 13:17 ` Dave Jones
2006-12-14 14:56 ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-14 15:22 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2006-12-13 22:55 ` nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements...] David Brownell
2006-12-13 21:56 ` nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP] Eugeny S. Mints
2006-12-13 21:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-13 22:27 ` nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements...] David Brownell
2006-12-13 21:27 ` nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP] Matthew Locke
2006-09-14 19:25 ` community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?] Jon Loeliger
2006-09-17 12:46 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-17 17:32 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-09-19 18:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-19 19:11 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-09-23 23:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 12:12 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 12:35 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-14 9:32 ` PowerOP on lkml or linux-pm? Matthew Locke
2006-09-14 9:45 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 9:58 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-14 9:47 ` community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?] Matthew Locke
2006-09-11 19:30 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-11 19:55 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 20:53 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-11 21:00 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 21:36 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-09-11 21:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 22:41 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-11 23:05 ` cpufreq user<->kernel interface removal [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP] Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 23:50 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-12 3:35 ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-09-12 8:41 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-12 17:03 ` Jon Loeliger
2006-09-14 16:26 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-17 12:37 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-17 13:10 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-17 13:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 22:05 ` community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?] Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-11 22:56 ` cpufreq terminally broken [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP] Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 22:56 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 0:17 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-12 3:37 ` Greg KH
2006-09-13 23:50 ` [linux-pm] " David Singleton
2006-09-14 5:30 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 5:30 ` [linux-pm] " Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 5:55 ` OpPoint summary Greg KH
2006-09-14 7:35 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 7:35 ` [linux-pm] " Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 16:55 ` David Singleton
2006-09-14 17:03 ` David Singleton
2006-09-14 17:07 ` David Singleton
2006-09-14 17:25 ` Auke Kok
2006-09-14 17:25 ` Auke Kok
2006-09-14 18:15 ` [linux-pm] " Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 18:17 ` David Singleton
2006-09-17 17:48 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-18 14:33 ` [linux-pm] " Richard A. Griffiths
2006-09-18 16:13 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-18 16:13 ` [linux-pm] " Matthew Locke
2006-09-14 17:11 ` David Singleton
2006-09-17 5:07 ` David Singleton
2006-09-17 12:56 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-17 12:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-17 22:43 ` [linux-pm] " Matthew Locke
2007-02-27 20:55 ` cpufreq terminally broken [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP] David Brownell
2007-02-27 22:41 ` Matthew Locke
2006-09-12 8:33 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 8:33 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 9:10 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-12 9:10 ` [linux-pm] " Vitaly Wool
2006-09-12 9:16 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 9:16 ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 9:23 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 15:04 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-14 15:04 ` [linux-pm] " Mark Gross
2006-09-14 14:58 ` Mark Gross
2006-10-05 3:30 ` community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?] Dominik Brodowski
2006-09-11 21:53 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-11 22:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 0:00 ` Mark Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060912033537.GC27397@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=lkml@elf.ucw.cz.kroah.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=scott.preece@motorola.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.