All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: neilb@suse.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, christopher.leech@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 03/19] raid5: move check parity operations to a workqueue
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:17:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060911231751.4737.68006.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1158015632.4241.31.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com>

From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

Enable handle_stripe5 to pass off check parity operations to
raid5_do_soft_block_ops formerly handled by compute_parity5.

Changelog:
* removed handle_check_operations5.  All logic moved into handle_stripe5 so
that we do not need to go through the initiation logic to end the
operation.
* clear the uptodate bit on the parity block
* hold off check operations if a parity dependent operation is in flight
like a write

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---

 drivers/md/raid5.c |   60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index e39d248..24ed4d8 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2121,35 +2121,59 @@ #endif
 			locked += handle_write_operations5(sh, rcw);
 	}
 
-	/* maybe we need to check and possibly fix the parity for this stripe
-	 * Any reads will already have been scheduled, so we just see if enough data
-	 * is available
+	/* 1/ Maybe we need to check and possibly fix the parity for this stripe.
+	 *    Any reads will already have been scheduled, so we just see if enough data
+	 *    is available.
+	 * 2/ Hold off parity checks while parity dependent operations are in flight
+	 *    (RCW and RMW are protected by 'locked')
 	 */
-	if (syncing && locked == 0 &&
-	    !test_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state)) {
+	if ((syncing && locked == 0 &&
+	    !test_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state)) ||
+	    	test_bit(STRIPE_OP_CHECK, &sh->state)) {
+
 		set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
+		/* Take one of the following actions:
+		 * 1/ start a check parity operation if (uptodate == disks)
+		 * 2/ finish a check parity operation and act on the result
+		 */
 		if (failed == 0) {
-			BUG_ON(uptodate != disks);
-			compute_parity5(sh, CHECK_PARITY);
-			uptodate--;
-			if (page_is_zero(sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].page)) {
-				/* parity is correct (on disc, not in buffer any more) */
-				set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
-			} else {
-				conf->mddev->resync_mismatches += STRIPE_SECTORS;
-				if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &conf->mddev->recovery))
-					/* don't try to repair!! */
+			if (!test_bit(STRIPE_OP_CHECK, &sh->state)) {
+				BUG_ON(uptodate != disks);
+				set_bit(STRIPE_OP_CHECK, &sh->state);
+				set_bit(STRIPE_OP_CHECK_Gen, &sh->ops.state);
+				clear_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].flags);
+				sh->ops.pending++;
+				uptodate--;
+			} else if (test_and_clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_CHECK_Done, &sh->ops.state)) {
+				clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_CHECK, &sh->state);
+
+				if (test_and_clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_CHECK_IsZero,
+							&sh->ops.state))
+					/* parity is correct (on disc, not in buffer any more) */
 					set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
 				else {
-					compute_block(sh, sh->pd_idx);
-					uptodate++;
+					conf->mddev->resync_mismatches += STRIPE_SECTORS;
+					if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &conf->mddev->recovery))
+						/* don't try to repair!! */
+						set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
+					else {
+						compute_block(sh, sh->pd_idx);
+						uptodate++;
+					}
 				}
 			}
 		}
-		if (!test_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state)) {
+
+		/* Wait for check parity operations to complete
+		 * before write-back
+		 */
+		if (!test_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state) &&
+			!test_bit(STRIPE_OP_CHECK, &sh->state)) {
+
 			/* either failed parity check, or recovery is happening */
 			if (failed==0)
 				failed_num = sh->pd_idx;
+
 			dev = &sh->dev[failed_num];
 			BUG_ON(!test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags));
 			BUG_ON(uptodate != disks);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-09-11 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-11 23:00 [PATCH 00/19] Hardware Accelerated MD RAID5: Introduction Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:00 ` Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:17 ` [PATCH 01/19] raid5: raid5_do_soft_block_ops Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:34   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:17 ` [PATCH 02/19] raid5: move write operations to a workqueue Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:36   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:17 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2006-09-11 23:17 ` [PATCH 04/19] raid5: move compute block " Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 05/19] raid5: move read completion copies " Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 06/19] raid5: move the reconstruct write expansion operation " Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 07/19] raid5: remove compute_block and compute_parity5 Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 08/19] dmaengine: enable multiple clients and operations Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:44   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-12  0:14     ` Dan Williams
2006-09-12  0:52       ` Roland Dreier
2006-09-12  6:18         ` Dan Williams
2006-09-12  9:15           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-09-13  4:04           ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-15 16:38     ` Olof Johansson
2006-09-15 19:44       ` [PATCH] dmaengine: clean up and abstract function types (was Re: [PATCH 08/19] dmaengine: enable multiple clients and operations) Olof Johansson
2006-09-15 20:02         ` [PATCH] [v2] " Olof Johansson
2006-09-18 22:56         ` [PATCH] " Dan Williams
2006-09-19  1:05           ` Olof Johansson
2006-09-19 11:20             ` Alan Cox
2006-09-19 16:32               ` Olof Johansson
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 09/19] dmaengine: reduce backend address permutations Dan Williams
2006-09-15 14:46   ` Olof Johansson
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 10/19] dmaengine: expose per channel dma mapping characteristics to clients Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 11/19] dmaengine: add memset as an asynchronous dma operation Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:50   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 12/19] dmaengine: dma_async_memcpy_err for DMA engines that do not support memcpy Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:51   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 13/19] dmaengine: add support for dma xor zero sum operations Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 14/19] dmaengine: add dma_sync_wait Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:52   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 15/19] dmaengine: raid5 dma client Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:54   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:19 ` [PATCH 16/19] dmaengine: Driver for the Intel IOP 32x, 33x, and 13xx RAID engines Dan Williams
2006-09-15 14:57   ` Olof Johansson
2006-09-11 23:19 ` [PATCH 17/19] iop3xx: define IOP3XX_REG_ADDR[32|16|8] and clean up DMA/AAU defs Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:55   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:19 ` [PATCH 18/19] iop3xx: Give Linux control over PCI (ATU) initialization Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:56   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:19 ` [PATCH 19/19] iop3xx: IOP 32x and 33x support for the iop-adma driver Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:38 ` [PATCH 00/19] Hardware Accelerated MD RAID5: Introduction Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:38   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:53   ` Dan Williams
2006-09-12  2:41     ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-12  5:47       ` Dan Williams
2006-09-13  4:05         ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-13  7:15 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-09-13 19:17   ` Dan Williams
2006-09-14  7:42     ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-10-11  1:46       ` Dan Williams
2006-10-08 22:18 ` Neil Brown
2006-10-10 18:23   ` Dan Williams
2006-10-11  2:44     ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060911231751.4737.68006.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.