Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

[Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>]

* Jes Sorensen (jes@sgi.com) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > The bottom line is :
> > 
> > LTTng impact on the studied phenomenon : 35% slower
> > 
> > LTTng+kprobes impact on the studied phenomenon : 73% slower
> > 
> > Therefore, I conclude that on this type of high event rate workload, kprobes
> > doubles the tracer impact on the system.
> 
> For this specific benchmark, for which we have not seen the code, nor
> do we know what system configuration it was run on. Sorry, but even M$'s
> sham benchmarks generally tell you which system they used for their
> tests.
> 
> In addition, some profiling would be interesting so we can see exactly
> where things go wrong and fix it. Ingo seems to be doing a good job at
> that even without you providing this basic info....
> 

Hi Jes,

I did not repeat my system configuration from the previous email in the thread
as it seemed redundant. Ingo asked me politely to tell more about my config
and tests, which I have done. Please read on further down this thread to get
that information.

Mathieu

OpenPGP public key:              http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint:     8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68