2.6.19 status

2.6.19 status

[David Miller]

I've just pushed my current net-2.6 tree to Linus.  The bulk of the
changes in there are endianness annotations for sparse by Al Viro,
along with the patches I've been ACK'ing here on the list and
elsewhere.

If you want a non-bugfix change to get into 2.6.19 you must have it to
me by the end of the weekend.

As of next Monday, anything I receive has to be a bugfix for 2.6.19
consideration.

Thanks for everyone's hard work and let's make sure there are no
networking regressions at all in 2.6.19, in fact let's strive to
make it have no regressions plus bugs fixed that were in 2.6.18 :-)

Re: 2.6.19 status

[Ismail Donmez]

Hi Dave,
29 Eyl 2006 Cum 04:41 tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız:
> I've just pushed my current net-2.6 tree to Linus.  The bulk of the
> changes in there are endianness annotations for sparse by Al Viro,
> along with the patches I've been ACK'ing here on the list and
> elsewhere.
>
> If you want a non-bugfix change to get into 2.6.19 you must have it to
> me by the end of the weekend.
>
> As of next Monday, anything I receive has to be a bugfix for 2.6.19
> consideration.
>
> Thanks for everyone's hard work and let's make sure there are no
> networking regressions at all in 2.6.19, in fact let's strive to
> make it have no regressions plus bugs fixed that were in 2.6.18 :-)

Looks like following fix from Herbert still didn't made it to Linus which 
fixes hard lockups with some tc usage.


[NET_SCHED]: HTB: fix incorrect use of RB_EMPTY_NODE

Fix incorrect use of RB_EMPTY_NODE in htb_safe_rb_erase, which makes it
skip nodes within the rbtree instead of nodes not in the tree, resulting
in crashes later on.

The root cause for this seems to be the very counter-intuitive behaviour
of the RB_EMPTY_NODE macro, which returns _false_ when the node is empty.

Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>

---
commit 9a0cd6d60280d88c38791844c87548d45cf6f2c2
tree fdf4f4a46fb088d957322006828af557b8ce594a
parent 7e4720201ad44ace85a443f41d668a62a737e7d0
author Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:27:24 +0200
committer Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:27:24 +0200

 net/sched/sch_htb.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/sch_htb.c b/net/sched/sch_htb.c
index bb3ddd4..6c058e3 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_htb.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_htb.c
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static inline void htb_add_class_to_row(
 /* If this triggers, it is a bug in this code, but it need not be fatal */
 static void htb_safe_rb_erase(struct rb_node *rb, struct rb_root *root)
 {
-	if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(rb)) {
+	if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(rb)) {
 		WARN_ON(1);
 	} else {
 		rb_erase(rb, root);


-- 
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety 
deserve neither liberty nor safety.
-- Benjamin Franklin

Re: 2.6.19 status

[David Miller]

From: Ismail Donmez <ismail@pardus.org.tr>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:10:34 +0300

> Hi Dave,
> 29 Eyl 2006 Cum 04:41 tarihinde ^[$,1 \x7f^[(Bunlar^[$,1 Q^[(B yazm^[$,1 Q \x7f^[(Bt^[$,1 Q^[(Bn^[$,1 Q^[(Bz:
> > I've just pushed my current net-2.6 tree to Linus.  The bulk of the
> > changes in there are endianness annotations for sparse by Al Viro,
> > along with the patches I've been ACK'ing here on the list and
> > elsewhere.
> >
> > If you want a non-bugfix change to get into 2.6.19 you must have it to
> > me by the end of the weekend.
> >
> > As of next Monday, anything I receive has to be a bugfix for 2.6.19
> > consideration.
> >
> > Thanks for everyone's hard work and let's make sure there are no
> > networking regressions at all in 2.6.19, in fact let's strive to
> > make it have no regressions plus bugs fixed that were in 2.6.18 :-)
> 
> Looks like following fix from Herbert still didn't made it to Linus which 
> fixes hard lockups with some tc usage.

It's in my net-2.6 tree, which is where you should check for
whether something is queued and pending submission yet.