All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: ak@suse.de
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19rc2 XFRM does too large direct mapping allocations for hashes
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:37:47 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061018.123747.59655253.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200610181350.22049.ak@suse.de>

From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:50:22 +0200

> I got this while restarting ipsec on a 2.6.19rc2 system that was
> up for a few days.

It's been fixed already in current GIT.

The xfrm state counters weren't being maintained correctly,
so they'd go "negative" and the hashing code thought it
needed a "huge" hash table. :-)

      reply	other threads:[~2006-10-18 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-18 11:50 2.6.19rc2 XFRM does too large direct mapping allocations for hashes Andi Kleen
2006-10-18 19:37 ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061018.123747.59655253.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.