All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.19rc2 XFRM does too large direct mapping allocations for hashes
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:50:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610181350.22049.ak@suse.de> (raw)


I got this while restarting ipsec on a 2.6.19rc2 system that was
up for a few days.

Order 8 is really a bit big to get from the direct mapping after
boot.

Should the hash allocation fall back to vmalloc?

-Andi

Initializing XFRM netlink socket
events/0: page allocation failure. order:8, mode:0xd0

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8024be30>] __alloc_pages+0x297/0x2ae
 [<ffffffff804a3127>] xfrm_hash_resize+0x0/0x27e
 [<ffffffff8024c301>] __get_free_pages+0x33/0x6d
 [<ffffffff804a4a21>] xfrm_hash_alloc+0x56/0x6d
 [<ffffffff804a3185>] xfrm_hash_resize+0x5e/0x27e
 [<ffffffff804a3127>] xfrm_hash_resize+0x0/0x27e
 [<ffffffff802369ca>] run_workqueue+0x92/0xe3
 [<ffffffff80236ab9>] worker_thread+0x0/0x119
 [<ffffffff80236ba0>] worker_thread+0xe7/0x119
 [<ffffffff80224a6e>] default_wake_function+0x0/0xe
 [<ffffffff80239900>] kthread+0xcb/0xf5
 [<ffffffff8020a1c5>] child_rip+0xa/0x15
 [<ffffffff80239835>] kthread+0x0/0xf5
 [<ffffffff8020a1bb>] child_rip+0x0/0x15

Mem-info:
DMA per-cpu:
CPU    0: Hot: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0   Cold: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
CPU    1: Hot: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0   Cold: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU    0: Hot: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 168   Cold: hi:   62, btch:  15 usd:  51
CPU    1: Hot: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  14   Cold: hi:   62, btch:  15 usd:  58
Active:293384 inactive:157186 Initializing XFRM netlink socket
events/0: page allocation failure. order:8, mode:0xd0

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8024be30>] __alloc_pages+0x297/0x2ae
 [<ffffffff804a3127>] xfrm_hash_resize+0x0/0x27e
 [<ffffffff8024c301>] __get_free_pages+0x33/0x6d
 [<ffffffff804a4a21>] xfrm_hash_alloc+0x56/0x6d
 [<ffffffff804a3185>] xfrm_hash_resize+0x5e/0x27e
 [<ffffffff804a3127>] xfrm_hash_resize+0x0/0x27e
 [<ffffffff802369ca>] run_workqueue+0x92/0xe3
 [<ffffffff80236ab9>] worker_thread+0x0/0x119
 [<ffffffff80236ba0>] worker_thread+0xe7/0x119
 [<ffffffff80224a6e>] default_wake_function+0x0/0xe
 [<ffffffff80239900>] kthread+0xcb/0xf5
 [<ffffffff8020a1c5>] child_rip+0xa/0x15
 [<ffffffff80239835>] kthread+0x0/0xf5
 [<ffffffff8020a1bb>] child_rip+0x0/0x15

Mem-info:
DMA per-cpu:
CPU    0: Hot: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0   Cold: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
CPU    1: Hot: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0   Cold: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU    0: Hot: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 168   Cold: hi:   62, btch:  15 usd:  51
CPU    1: Hot: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  14   Cold: hi:   62, btch:  15 usd:  58
Active:293384 inactive:157186 dirty:94 writeback:0 unstable:0 free:10372 slab:46328 mapped:18292 pagetables:1952
DMA free:8040kB min:28kB low:32kB high:40kB active:2720kB inactive:40kB present:10396kB pages_scanned:32 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2002 2002
DMA32 free:33448kB min:5708kB low:7132kB high:8560kB active:1170816kB inactive:628704kB present:2050208kB pages_scanned:152 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0
DMA: 0*4kB 1*8kB 0*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 1*2048kB 1*4096kB = 8040kB
DMA32: 6862*4kB 260*8kB 41*16kB 18*32kB 10*64kB 2*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 33448kB
Swap cache: add 92, delete 92, find 27/32, race 0+0
Free swap  = 987988kB
Total swap = 987988kB
Free swap:       987988kB
524032 pages of RAM
9689 reserved pages
260692 pages shared
0 pages swap cached
events/0: page allocation failure. order:8, mode:0xd0
dirty:94 writeback:0 unstable:0 free:10372 slab:46328 mapped:18292 pagetables:1952
DMA free:8040kB min:28kB low:32kB high:40kB active:2720kB inactive:40kB present:10396kB pages_scanned:32 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2002 2002
DMA32 free:33448kB min:5708kB low:7132kB high:8560kB active:1170816kB inactive:628704kB present:2050208kB pages_scanned:152 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0
DMA: 0*4kB 1*8kB 0*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 1*2048kB 1*4096kB = 8040kB
DMA32: 6862*4kB 260*8kB 41*16kB 18*32kB 10*64kB 2*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 33448kB
Swap cache: add 92, delete 92, find 27/32, race 0+0
Free swap  = 987988kB
Total swap = 987988kB
Free swap:       987988kB
524032 pages of RAM
9689 reserved pages
260692 pages shared
0 pages swap cached
events/0: page allocation failure. order:8, mode:0xd0

... repeated a few times with the same backtrace ...

             reply	other threads:[~2006-10-18 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-18 11:50 Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-10-18 19:37 ` 2.6.19rc2 XFRM does too large direct mapping allocations for hashes David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200610181350.22049.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.