All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dealing with excessive includes
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 09:13:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061018151319.GQ22289@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610180759070.3962@g5.osdl.org>

On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:04:24AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> > +#define lock_super(x) do {		\
> > +	struct super_block *sb = x;	\
> > +	get_fs_excl();			\
> > +	mutex_lock(&sb->s_lock);	\
> > +} while(0)
> 
> Don't do this. The "x" passed in may be "sb", and then you end up with 
> bogus code.

For this one, I see a third way:

#define lock_super(sb) do {		\
	get_fs_excl();			\
	mutex_lock(&(sb)->s_lock);	\
} while (0)

It does have the disadvantage that you can pass *anything* that has
an s_lock field in ... but I don't think that's a very likely thing
to happen.

Or you could use _sb as the local variable, since it's a reserved
identifier.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-18 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-17  0:50 [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned Al Viro
2006-10-17  1:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-17  4:37   ` Al Viro
2006-10-17 15:12     ` Bogus deps checking (was Re: [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned) Ray Lehtiniemi
2006-10-17 15:24     ` [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned Linus Torvalds
2006-10-18  4:40       ` dealing with excessive includes Al Viro
2006-10-18  9:19         ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-10-18  9:31           ` Al Viro
2006-10-18 10:00             ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-10-18 17:42               ` Al Viro
2006-10-18 21:48                 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-10-18 15:04             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-18 15:13               ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2006-10-18 16:06               ` Al Viro
2006-10-18 16:32                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-18 17:44                   ` Al Viro
2006-10-19 16:23                   ` Al Viro
2006-10-19 18:24                   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-10-20  0:53                   ` Al Viro
2006-10-20  0:57                     ` Al Viro
2006-10-20 12:43                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-20  0:58                     ` Al Viro
2006-10-20  0:59                     ` Al Viro
2006-10-20  1:02                     ` Al Viro
2006-10-20  4:35                     ` Randy Dunlap
2006-10-20  9:26                       ` Stefan Richter
2006-10-20 16:13                         ` Randy Dunlap
2006-10-20 17:51                           ` Stefan Richter
2006-10-22 17:58                           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-10-22 22:59                             ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-23  8:29                               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-10-23 16:09                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-23 16:13                                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-10-23 16:31                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-23 16:52                                       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-10-23 17:05                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-23  0:31                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-23  0:42                               ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-23  1:08                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-23  1:31                                   ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-23  1:36                                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-23  1:41                                       ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-23  8:34                                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-10-23  1:48                                       ` Randy Dunlap
2006-10-23  1:49                                       ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-23  6:34                                         ` Stefan Richter
2006-10-18 16:15               ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-10-18 16:21                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-18  5:42     ` [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned Dave Jones
2006-10-18  6:05       ` Al Viro
2006-10-19 16:52         ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-10-19 16:58           ` Al Viro
2006-10-17  9:04 ` David Howells
2006-10-17 15:28   ` Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-28 15:24 dealing with excessive includes Tim Schmielau
2006-10-30 10:45 Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061018151319.GQ22289@parisc-linux.org \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.