* Masquerading, IPSEC and bridged interfaces
@ 2006-10-30 9:00 Joerg Platte
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Joerg Platte @ 2006-10-30 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
Hi,
currently I'm using kernel 2.6.18.1 on one of my computers. The router acts as
an ipsec endpoint and masquerades all packets received via ipsec.
Today I replaced the local ethernet interface by a bridged interface by
combining the ethernet interface with a tap interface. I changed the
interface names in my iptables-based firewall to match the new bridge
interface name and did not change anything else.
Unfortunately, masquerading does not work with this setup. tcpdump reveals,
that all received replies (I tested it with ping) are forwarded unencrypted,
because they are visible on my firewall instead of being encrypted. Is this a
known problem, or did I forget to change anything? Or should I forward my
question to another list?
regards,
Jörg
--
PGP Key: send mail with subject 'SEND PGP-KEY' PGP Key-ID: FD 4E 21 1D
PGP Fingerprint: 388A872AFC5649D3 BCEC65778BE0C605
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-10-30 9:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-30 9:00 Masquerading, IPSEC and bridged interfaces Joerg Platte
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.