From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Chandra S Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
linux-audit@redhat.com, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
LSE-Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] Task Watchers v2: Register semundo task watcher
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:23:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061103042749.061929000@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20061103042257.274316000@us.ibm.com
[-- Attachment #1: task-watchers-register-semundo --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7490 bytes --]
Make the semaphore undo code use a task watcher instead of hooking into
copy_process() and do_exit() directly.
Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/sem.h | 17 -----------------
ipc/sem.c | 12 ++++++++----
kernel/exit.c | 3 ---
kernel/fork.c | 6 +-----
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
Benchmark results:
System: 4 1.7GHz ppc64 (Power 4+) processors, 30968600MB RAM, 2.6.19-rc2-mm2 kernel
Clone Number of Children Cloned
5000 7500 10000 12500 15000 17500
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean 17960.5 18169.3 18408.2 18479.9 18515.6 18465.4
Dev 305.381 314.209 292.395 284.992 299.331 295.311
Err (%) 1.70029 1.72934 1.5884 1.54217 1.61664 1.59927
Fork Number of Children Forked
5000 7500 10000 12500 15000 17500
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean 18050.2 18141.4 18316.2 18386.2 18441.9 18476.2
Dev 295.68 312.922 296.962 298.81 300.985 294.046
Err (%) 1.63809 1.72491 1.62131 1.62519 1.63207 1.59149
Kernbench:
Elapsed: 124.272s User: 439.643s System: 46.32s CPU: 390.5%
439.64user 46.25system 2:04.46elapsed 390%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.70user 46.27system 2:04.04elapsed 391%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.64user 46.31system 2:04.18elapsed 391%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.49user 46.27system 2:04.41elapsed 390%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.55user 46.47system 2:04.32elapsed 390%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.77user 46.29system 2:04.63elapsed 390%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.61user 46.31system 2:04.09elapsed 391%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.68user 46.31system 2:04.02elapsed 391%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.76user 46.49system 2:04.59elapsed 390%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.59user 46.23system 2:03.98elapsed 391%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/ipc/sem.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2.orig/ipc/sem.c
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/ipc/sem.c
@@ -81,10 +81,11 @@
#include <linux/audit.h>
#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/nsproxy.h>
+#include <linux/task_watchers.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include "util.h"
#define sem_ids(ns) (*((ns)->ids[IPC_SEM_IDS]))
@@ -1288,11 +1289,11 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semop (int semid, st
* See the notes above unlock_semundo() regarding the spin_lock_init()
* in this code. Initialize the undo_list->lock here instead of get_undo_list()
* because of the reasoning in the comment above unlock_semundo.
*/
-int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
+static int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
int error;
if (clone_flags & CLONE_SYSVSEM) {
@@ -1304,10 +1305,11 @@ int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_fla
} else
tsk->sysvsem.undo_list = NULL;
return 0;
}
+task_watcher_func(init, copy_semundo);
/*
* add semadj values to semaphores, free undo structures.
* undo structures are not freed when semaphore arrays are destroyed
* so some of them may be out of date.
@@ -1317,22 +1319,22 @@ int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_fla
* should we queue up and wait until we can do so legally?
* The original implementation attempted to do this (queue and wait).
* The current implementation does not do so. The POSIX standard
* and SVID should be consulted to determine what behavior is mandated.
*/
-void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static int exit_sem(unsigned long ignored, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
struct sem_undo *u, **up;
struct ipc_namespace *ns;
undo_list = tsk->sysvsem.undo_list;
if (!undo_list)
- return;
+ return 0;
if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&undo_list->refcnt))
- return;
+ return 0;
ns = tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns;
/* There's no need to hold the semundo list lock, as current
* is the last task exiting for this undo list.
*/
@@ -1395,11 +1397,13 @@ found:
update_queue(sma);
next_entry:
sem_unlock(sma);
}
kfree(undo_list);
+ return 0;
}
+task_watcher_func(free, exit_sem);
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void *it)
{
struct sem_array *sma = it;
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/kernel/exit.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2.orig/kernel/exit.c
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/kernel/exit.c
@@ -46,12 +46,10 @@
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/unistd.h>
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
-extern void sem_exit (void);
-
static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk);
static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p)
{
nr_threads--;
@@ -919,11 +917,10 @@ fastcall NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long co
exit_mm(tsk);
notify_task_watchers(WATCH_TASK_FREE, code, tsk);
if (group_dead)
acct_process();
- exit_sem(tsk);
__exit_files(tsk);
__exit_fs(tsk);
exit_thread();
cpuset_exit(tsk);
exit_keys(tsk);
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/kernel/fork.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2.orig/kernel/fork.c
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1095,14 +1095,12 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
#endif
if ((retval = security_task_alloc(p)))
goto bad_fork_cleanup_policy;
/* copy all the process information */
- if ((retval = copy_semundo(clone_flags, p)))
- goto bad_fork_cleanup_security;
if ((retval = copy_files(clone_flags, p)))
- goto bad_fork_cleanup_semundo;
+ goto bad_fork_cleanup_security;
if ((retval = copy_fs(clone_flags, p)))
goto bad_fork_cleanup_files;
if ((retval = copy_sighand(clone_flags, p)))
goto bad_fork_cleanup_fs;
if ((retval = copy_signal(clone_flags, p)))
@@ -1269,12 +1267,10 @@ bad_fork_cleanup_sighand:
__cleanup_sighand(p->sighand);
bad_fork_cleanup_fs:
exit_fs(p); /* blocking */
bad_fork_cleanup_files:
exit_files(p); /* blocking */
-bad_fork_cleanup_semundo:
- exit_sem(p);
bad_fork_cleanup_security:
security_task_free(p);
bad_fork_cleanup_policy:
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
mpol_free(p->mempolicy);
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/include/linux/sem.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2.orig/include/linux/sem.h
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/include/linux/sem.h
@@ -136,25 +136,8 @@ struct sem_undo_list {
struct sysv_sem {
struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
};
-#ifdef CONFIG_SYSVIPC
-
-extern int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk);
-extern void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk);
-
-#else
-static inline int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- return;
-}
-#endif
-
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _LINUX_SEM_H */
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
LSE-Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Chandra S Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>,
linux-audit@redhat.com, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] Task Watchers v2: Register semundo task watcher
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:23:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061103042749.061929000@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20061103042257.274316000@us.ibm.com
[-- Attachment #1: task-watchers-register-semundo --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7115 bytes --]
Make the semaphore undo code use a task watcher instead of hooking into
copy_process() and do_exit() directly.
Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/sem.h | 17 -----------------
ipc/sem.c | 12 ++++++++----
kernel/exit.c | 3 ---
kernel/fork.c | 6 +-----
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
Benchmark results:
System: 4 1.7GHz ppc64 (Power 4+) processors, 30968600MB RAM, 2.6.19-rc2-mm2 kernel
Clone Number of Children Cloned
5000 7500 10000 12500 15000 17500
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean 17960.5 18169.3 18408.2 18479.9 18515.6 18465.4
Dev 305.381 314.209 292.395 284.992 299.331 295.311
Err (%) 1.70029 1.72934 1.5884 1.54217 1.61664 1.59927
Fork Number of Children Forked
5000 7500 10000 12500 15000 17500
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean 18050.2 18141.4 18316.2 18386.2 18441.9 18476.2
Dev 295.68 312.922 296.962 298.81 300.985 294.046
Err (%) 1.63809 1.72491 1.62131 1.62519 1.63207 1.59149
Kernbench:
Elapsed: 124.272s User: 439.643s System: 46.32s CPU: 390.5%
439.64user 46.25system 2:04.46elapsed 390%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.70user 46.27system 2:04.04elapsed 391%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.64user 46.31system 2:04.18elapsed 391%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.49user 46.27system 2:04.41elapsed 390%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.55user 46.47system 2:04.32elapsed 390%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.77user 46.29system 2:04.63elapsed 390%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.61user 46.31system 2:04.09elapsed 391%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.68user 46.31system 2:04.02elapsed 391%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.76user 46.49system 2:04.59elapsed 390%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
439.59user 46.23system 2:03.98elapsed 391%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/ipc/sem.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2.orig/ipc/sem.c
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/ipc/sem.c
@@ -81,10 +81,11 @@
#include <linux/audit.h>
#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/nsproxy.h>
+#include <linux/task_watchers.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include "util.h"
#define sem_ids(ns) (*((ns)->ids[IPC_SEM_IDS]))
@@ -1288,11 +1289,11 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semop (int semid, st
* See the notes above unlock_semundo() regarding the spin_lock_init()
* in this code. Initialize the undo_list->lock here instead of get_undo_list()
* because of the reasoning in the comment above unlock_semundo.
*/
-int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
+static int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
int error;
if (clone_flags & CLONE_SYSVSEM) {
@@ -1304,10 +1305,11 @@ int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_fla
} else
tsk->sysvsem.undo_list = NULL;
return 0;
}
+task_watcher_func(init, copy_semundo);
/*
* add semadj values to semaphores, free undo structures.
* undo structures are not freed when semaphore arrays are destroyed
* so some of them may be out of date.
@@ -1317,22 +1319,22 @@ int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_fla
* should we queue up and wait until we can do so legally?
* The original implementation attempted to do this (queue and wait).
* The current implementation does not do so. The POSIX standard
* and SVID should be consulted to determine what behavior is mandated.
*/
-void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static int exit_sem(unsigned long ignored, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
struct sem_undo *u, **up;
struct ipc_namespace *ns;
undo_list = tsk->sysvsem.undo_list;
if (!undo_list)
- return;
+ return 0;
if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&undo_list->refcnt))
- return;
+ return 0;
ns = tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns;
/* There's no need to hold the semundo list lock, as current
* is the last task exiting for this undo list.
*/
@@ -1395,11 +1397,13 @@ found:
update_queue(sma);
next_entry:
sem_unlock(sma);
}
kfree(undo_list);
+ return 0;
}
+task_watcher_func(free, exit_sem);
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void *it)
{
struct sem_array *sma = it;
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/kernel/exit.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2.orig/kernel/exit.c
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/kernel/exit.c
@@ -46,12 +46,10 @@
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/unistd.h>
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
-extern void sem_exit (void);
-
static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk);
static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p)
{
nr_threads--;
@@ -919,11 +917,10 @@ fastcall NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long co
exit_mm(tsk);
notify_task_watchers(WATCH_TASK_FREE, code, tsk);
if (group_dead)
acct_process();
- exit_sem(tsk);
__exit_files(tsk);
__exit_fs(tsk);
exit_thread();
cpuset_exit(tsk);
exit_keys(tsk);
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/kernel/fork.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2.orig/kernel/fork.c
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1095,14 +1095,12 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
#endif
if ((retval = security_task_alloc(p)))
goto bad_fork_cleanup_policy;
/* copy all the process information */
- if ((retval = copy_semundo(clone_flags, p)))
- goto bad_fork_cleanup_security;
if ((retval = copy_files(clone_flags, p)))
- goto bad_fork_cleanup_semundo;
+ goto bad_fork_cleanup_security;
if ((retval = copy_fs(clone_flags, p)))
goto bad_fork_cleanup_files;
if ((retval = copy_sighand(clone_flags, p)))
goto bad_fork_cleanup_fs;
if ((retval = copy_signal(clone_flags, p)))
@@ -1269,12 +1267,10 @@ bad_fork_cleanup_sighand:
__cleanup_sighand(p->sighand);
bad_fork_cleanup_fs:
exit_fs(p); /* blocking */
bad_fork_cleanup_files:
exit_files(p); /* blocking */
-bad_fork_cleanup_semundo:
- exit_sem(p);
bad_fork_cleanup_security:
security_task_free(p);
bad_fork_cleanup_policy:
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
mpol_free(p->mempolicy);
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/include/linux/sem.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2.orig/include/linux/sem.h
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc2-mm2/include/linux/sem.h
@@ -136,25 +136,8 @@ struct sem_undo_list {
struct sysv_sem {
struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
};
-#ifdef CONFIG_SYSVIPC
-
-extern int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk);
-extern void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk);
-
-#else
-static inline int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- return;
-}
-#endif
-
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _LINUX_SEM_H */
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-03 4:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-03 4:22 [PATCH 0/9] Task Watchers v2: Introduction Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:22 ` Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:22 ` [PATCH 1/9] Task Watchers v2: Task watchers v2 Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:22 ` Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 13:22 ` Daniel Walker
2006-11-03 13:22 ` Daniel Walker
2006-11-04 0:43 ` Matt Helsley
2006-11-04 0:43 ` Matt Helsley
2006-11-04 1:13 ` Daniel Walker
2006-11-04 1:13 ` Daniel Walker
2006-11-05 0:12 ` Matt Helsley
2006-11-05 0:12 ` Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:22 ` [PATCH 2/9] Task Watchers v2: Register audit task watcher Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:22 ` Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:23 ` Matt Helsley [this message]
2006-11-03 4:23 ` [PATCH 3/9] Task Watchers v2: Register semundo " Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:23 ` [PATCH 4/9] Task Watchers v2: Register cpuset " Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:23 ` Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:23 ` [PATCH 5/9] Task Watchers v2: Register NUMA mempolicy " Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:23 ` Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:23 ` [PATCH 6/9] Task Watchers v2: Register IRQ flag tracing " Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:23 ` Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:23 ` [PATCH 7/9] Task Watchers v2: Register lockdep " Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:23 ` Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:23 ` [PATCH 8/9] Task Watchers v2: Register process keyrings " Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:23 ` Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:23 ` [PATCH 9/9] Task Watchers v2: Register process events connector Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 4:23 ` Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 8:57 ` [PATCH 0/9] Task Watchers v2: Introduction Paul Jackson
2006-11-03 8:57 ` Paul Jackson
2006-11-03 22:55 ` Matt Helsley
2006-11-03 22:55 ` Matt Helsley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061103042749.061929000@us.ibm.com \
--to=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.