From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
akpm@osdl.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,
nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:50:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061107095049.B3262@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611070954210.3791@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>; from clameter@sgi.com on Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:55:54AM -0800
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:55:54AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
>
> > Christoph, DECLARE_TASKLET that you had atleast needs to be per cpu..
> > Not sure if there are any other concerns.
>
> Nope. Tasklets scheduled and executed per cpu. These are the former bottom
> halves. See tasklet_schedule in kernel/softirq.c
You must be referring to __tasklet_schedule() ?
tasklet_schedule doesn't schedule if there is already one scheduled.
no?
thanks,
suresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-07 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200611032205.kA3M5wmJ003178@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
2006-11-07 7:32 ` + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree Ingo Molnar
2006-11-07 17:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 17:31 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-07 17:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 17:50 ` Siddha, Suresh B [this message]
2006-11-07 18:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 19:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 20:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-07 20:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 21:35 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-07 21:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-10 6:18 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-10 18:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-10 21:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-11 1:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-11 2:05 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-11 2:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-13 4:03 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-13 5:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-13 6:40 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-14 1:06 ` [patch] sched domain: move sched group allocations to percpu area Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-14 8:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-14 16:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-10 21:42 ` + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree Ingo Molnar
2006-11-10 22:32 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-11 1:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 19:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 20:29 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061107095049.B3262@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.