From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,
nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:29:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061107202943.GA4753@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611070954210.3791@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
* Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
>
> > Christoph, DECLARE_TASKLET that you had atleast needs to be per
> > cpu.. Not sure if there are any other concerns.
>
> Nope. Tasklets scheduled and executed per cpu. These are the former
> bottom halves. See tasklet_schedule in kernel/softirq.c
no, they are "task"-lets. Softirqs are the equivalent of former
bottom-halves.
a tasklet may run on any CPU but its execution is globally serialized -
it's not what we want to do in the scheduler.
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-07 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200611032205.kA3M5wmJ003178@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
2006-11-07 7:32 ` + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree Ingo Molnar
2006-11-07 17:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 17:31 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-07 17:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 17:50 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-07 18:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 19:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 20:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-07 20:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 21:35 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-07 21:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-10 6:18 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-10 18:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-10 21:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-11 1:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-11 2:05 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-11 2:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-13 4:03 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-13 5:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-13 6:40 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-14 1:06 ` [patch] sched domain: move sched group allocations to percpu area Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-14 8:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-14 16:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-10 21:42 ` + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree Ingo Molnar
2006-11-10 22:32 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-11 1:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 19:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 20:29 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061107202943.GA4753@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.