[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] U-boot-1.1.6 for Wind River SBC8349

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] U-boot-1.1.6 for Wind River SBC8349

[Paul Gortmaker]

Hi folks,

I've attached my patches below that add support for the Wind River
SBC8347E/9E boards.  Most of my testing has been done on the SBC8349E
variant, but earlier versions were also tested on the SBC8347E.

Patches are against the recently released 1.1.6 version of U-Boot.

Thanks to the implementation for the MPC8349 by the folks at Freescale,
a lot of the heavy lifting was already done.  Of course there were still
the usual handfull of "gotcha"s.  PCI is also supported, and I've tested
with an intel e1000 card.  I've left PCI off by default though, since
there were early rev CPUs that had PCI issues.

Outside of the typical core board files, the only thing I had to update
was the TSEC driver to add support for a new PHY type (Broadcom).

I think I've got all the extra details to make it ready for inclusion
(e.g. updated MAKEALL, provided a README, etc.) but if there is
something I need to change/add/update, just let me know and I'll take
care of it next week.

Thanks,
Paul.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: u-boot-1.1.6-sbc8349.diff7.gz
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 15720 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20061117/91ab70a9/attachment.obj 

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] U-boot-1.1.6 for Wind River SBC8349

[Kumar Gala]

On Nov 17, 2006, at 3:34 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I've attached my patches below that add support for the Wind River
> SBC8347E/9E boards.  Most of my testing has been done on the SBC8349E
> variant, but earlier versions were also tested on the SBC8347E.
>
> Patches are against the recently released 1.1.6 version of U-Boot.
>
> Thanks to the implementation for the MPC8349 by the folks at  
> Freescale,
> a lot of the heavy lifting was already done.  Of course there were  
> still
> the usual handfull of "gotcha"s.  PCI is also supported, and I've  
> tested
> with an intel e1000 card.  I've left PCI off by default though, since
> there were early rev CPUs that had PCI issues.
>
> Outside of the typical core board files, the only thing I had to  
> update
> was the TSEC driver to add support for a new PHY type (Broadcom).
>
> I think I've got all the extra details to make it ready for inclusion
> (e.g. updated MAKEALL, provided a README, etc.) but if there is
> something I need to change/add/update, just let me know and I'll take
> care of it next week.

Glancing at your patch it doesn't look like you are enabling the flat  
device tree support.  I'd recommend fixing that since its a  
requirement for boot future linux kernel's.

- kumar

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] U-boot-1.1.6 for Wind River SBC8349

[Paul Gortmaker]

In message: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] U-boot-1.1.6 for Wind River SBC8349
on 17/11/2006 Kumar Gala wrote:

> 
> Glancing at your patch it doesn't look like you are enabling the flat  
> device tree support.  I'd recommend fixing that since its a  
> requirement for boot future linux kernel's.

I had thought of that, but figured I'd leave it off until I had a
chance to implement/test the arch/powerpc version of support for this
board; at the moment it is still arch/ppc.  I suppose I could enable
it and then use "disable_of" if folks feel this is more future-proof...

Paul.

> 
> - kumar

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] U-boot-1.1.6 for Wind River SBC8349

[Kumar Gala]

On Nov 17, 2006, at 4:32 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:

> In message: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] U-boot-1.1.6 for Wind River  
> SBC8349
> on 17/11/2006 Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>>
>> Glancing at your patch it doesn't look like you are enabling the flat
>> device tree support.  I'd recommend fixing that since its a
>> requirement for boot future linux kernel's.
>
> I had thought of that, but figured I'd leave it off until I had a
> chance to implement/test the arch/powerpc version of support for this
> board; at the moment it is still arch/ppc.  I suppose I could enable
> it and then use "disable_of" if folks feel this is more future- 
> proof...

Its going to be more feature proof that way.

- k

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] U-boot-1.1.6 for Wind River SBC8349

[Paul Gortmaker]

In message: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] U-boot-1.1.6 for Wind River SBC8349
on 17/11/2006 Kumar Gala wrote:

> 
> On Nov 17, 2006, at 4:32 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> 
> >In message: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] U-boot-1.1.6 for Wind River  
> >SBC8349
> >on 17/11/2006 Kumar Gala wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Glancing at your patch it doesn't look like you are enabling the flat
> >>device tree support.  I'd recommend fixing that since its a
> >>requirement for boot future linux kernel's.
> >
> >I had thought of that, but figured I'd leave it off until I had a
> >chance to implement/test the arch/powerpc version of support for this
> >board; at the moment it is still arch/ppc.  I suppose I could enable
> >it and then use "disable_of" if folks feel this is more future- 
> >proof...
> 
> Its going to be more feature proof that way.
> 
> - k

Ok.  I will enable it in the config.sh, and retest it next week to ensure
it doesn't do anything unexpected.  Thanks for the feedback.

Paul.

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] U-boot-1.1.6 for Wind River SBC8349

[Kim Phillips]

On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:39:30 -0600
Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

> 
> > board; at the moment it is still arch/ppc.  I suppose I could enable
> > it and then use "disable_of" if folks feel this is more future- 
> > proof...
> 
> Its going to be more feature proof that way.
> 

Grant Likely has a patch so you don't have to disable_of:

http://git.secretlab.ca/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?h=fc86f6ee806b88faf120d7560c8cc026e415af65;p=u-boot.git;a=commitdiff

It is currently pending WD pulling, as is the u-boot-83xx.git tree I asked WD to pull a couple of weeks ago (that was largely based on patches sent to this list months ago).

It looks like Wolfgang has a priority call to make here since these sbc8349 patches don't apply to the u-boot-83xx.git tree I requested he pull.

Kim