Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT

[Martin Waitz <tali@admingilde.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1781 bytes --]

hoi :)

On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 10:04:20AM +0000, Andy Parkins wrote:
> On Friday 2006, December 01 22:08, Martin Waitz wrote:
> 
> > > echo $SUBMODULE_HASH >
> > > submodule/.git/refs/supermodules/commit$SUPERMODULE_HASH
> >
> > I guess you are aware that you have to scan _all_ trees inside _all_
> > supermodule commits for possible references.
> 
> No you don't; you do it as part of the appropriate normal operations.
> 
>  * supermodule commit - scan the current tree for "link" objects in the
>    tree.  If you find one write the reference in the submodule.
>  * adding a new submodule - if this is a new submodule there can't be any
>    references in the supermodule already.
>  * cloning a supermodule, every new commit that gets written in the 
>    supermodule gets checked from "link" objects.

 * removing a branch from the supermodule.
   OK, this is an infrequent operation and it can be handled by redoing
   everything.

I just don't like to duplicate information which is already available
easily.  We'd need much to many special cases, just to correctly support
reachablility analysis.
KISS.

> > So what do you do with deleted submodules?
> > You wouldn't want them to still sit around in your working directory,
> > but you still have to preserve them.
> 
> Now that is a tricky one.  Mind you, I think that problem exists for any 
> implementation.  I haven't got a good answer for that.

If you just keep it in a shared object repository you don't have any
problems.

Please note that it is not required to keep it in one physical location.
You can still use alternates/whatever to store some objects in another
repository, but you need to be able to access all objects from the
supermodule.

-- 
Martin Waitz

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]