From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz@gmx.ch>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Brice Goglin <brice@myri.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Bauke Jan Douma <bjdouma@xs4all.nl>,
Tomasz Koprowski <tomek@koprowski.org>,
gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:37:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061207163703.GB16103@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061207145755.GI8963@stusta.de>
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 03:57:56PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Looking at Alan's patch in -mm, it seems the best current solution for
> 2.6.16 is to go back to the pre-2.6.16.17
> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_via_irq);
> and revisit this after Alan's patch was released with 2.6.20?
If you want 2.6.16.* not to risk any reversions of good behaviour then I'd agree
I'm pretty sure the new code is right cool and wonderful *BUT* it may not be
of course and it may also break broken bioses differently 8(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-07 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-07 13:24 RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16 Adrian Bunk
2006-12-07 13:53 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-12-07 17:27 ` Bauke Jan Douma
2006-12-07 18:32 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-12-08 15:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-07 14:38 ` Daniel Drake
2006-12-07 14:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-07 16:37 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2006-12-10 4:09 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-12-10 16:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-10 16:22 ` Daniel Drake
2006-12-10 22:33 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-12-10 22:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-10 22:49 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-12-11 1:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-10 23:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-11 1:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-11 12:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-19 6:08 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-12-11 1:42 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-12-11 12:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-11 12:48 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-12-11 13:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-07 19:54 ` Jean Delvare
2006-12-07 20:45 ` Tomek Koprowski
2006-12-08 15:42 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-08 16:11 ` RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16 (v2) Adrian Bunk
2006-12-08 21:02 ` RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16 Brice Goglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061207163703.GB16103@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=bjdouma@xs4all.nl \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=brice@myri.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=daniel.ritz@gmx.ch \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=tomek@koprowski.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.