From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>, Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz@gmx.ch>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Brice Goglin <brice@myri.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Bauke Jan Douma <bjdouma@xs4all.nl>,
Tomasz Koprowski <tomek@koprowski.org>,
gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:00:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061210160053.GD10351@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1165723779.334.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 04:09:39AM +0000, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 09:38 -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Daniel Drake (1):
> > > PCI: VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
> >
> > Please drop this one, Alan isn't 100% on it and is working on getting a
> > better fix into mainline
> >
> > Daniel
>
> Sorry Daniel, I don't agree with you, this patch is a improvement of the
> original patch and in my opinion should go in.
> As Alan explain to us, is not the prefect one, but still be an
> improvement.
Below is the patch for going back to the 2.6.16.16 status quo that is in
2.6.16.36-rc1.
Does this cause any serious regression for anyone?
> Thanks,
> Sérgio M. B.
cu
Adrian
commit dcb1715778026c4aec20d186dc794245d9a1f5de
Author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Date: Fri Dec 8 17:00:35 2006 +0100
revert the quirk_via_irq changes
This patch reverts the quirk_via_irq changes in 2.6.16.17 that
caused regressions for several people.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
index a1cdf06..2a66e39 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
@@ -656,13 +656,7 @@ static void quirk_via_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, new_irq);
}
}
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_0, quirk_via_irq);
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_1, quirk_via_irq);
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_2, quirk_via_irq);
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_3, quirk_via_irq);
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686, quirk_via_irq);
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686_4, quirk_via_irq);
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686_5, quirk_via_irq);
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_via_irq);
/*
* VIA VT82C598 has its device ID settable and many BIOSes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-10 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-07 13:24 RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16 Adrian Bunk
2006-12-07 13:53 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-12-07 17:27 ` Bauke Jan Douma
2006-12-07 18:32 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-12-08 15:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-07 14:38 ` Daniel Drake
2006-12-07 14:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-07 16:37 ` Alan Cox
2006-12-10 4:09 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-12-10 16:00 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-12-10 16:22 ` Daniel Drake
2006-12-10 22:33 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-12-10 22:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-10 22:49 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-12-11 1:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-10 23:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-11 1:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-11 12:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-19 6:08 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-12-11 1:42 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-12-11 12:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-11 12:48 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-12-11 13:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-07 19:54 ` Jean Delvare
2006-12-07 20:45 ` Tomek Koprowski
2006-12-08 15:42 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-08 16:11 ` RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16 (v2) Adrian Bunk
2006-12-08 21:02 ` RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16 Brice Goglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061210160053.GD10351@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=bjdouma@xs4all.nl \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=brice@myri.com \
--cc=daniel.ritz@gmx.ch \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org \
--cc=tomek@koprowski.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.