From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] UML and fastcall/FASTCALL
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 19:04:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061208180455.GD3356@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061208163304.GA5944@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 11:33:04AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:59:28PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > UML on i386 is now the only case where fastcall/FASTCALL is not a noop.
>
> If i386 doesn't use it any more, then UML shouldn't either. The only reason
> there's support for it in UML is that I was copying i386.
It's a noop on i386 due to -mregparm=3 ...
> Jeff
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UML and fastcall/FASTCALL
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 19:04:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061208180455.GD3356@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061208163304.GA5944@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 11:33:04AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:59:28PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > UML on i386 is now the only case where fastcall/FASTCALL is not a noop.
>
> If i386 doesn't use it any more, then UML shouldn't either. The only reason
> there's support for it in UML is that I was copying i386.
It's a noop on i386 due to -mregparm=3 ...
> Jeff
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-08 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-08 12:59 [uml-devel] UML and fastcall/FASTCALL Adrian Bunk
2006-12-08 12:59 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-08 16:33 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2006-12-08 16:33 ` Jeff Dike
2006-12-08 18:04 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-12-08 18:04 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061208180455.GD3356@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.