All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] set_current_state usage in oss/
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 04:29:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070103042934.GH14048@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1167089629.11578.2.camel@alice>

On 03.01.2007 [00:23:26 +0100], Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> hi,
> 
> thanks for your comments, i am sorry i
> didnt have time to look at this again until now
> 
> > >  			}
> > >  			mutex_unlock(&bta->lock);
> > > -			current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
> > > +			__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> > >  			schedule();
> > >  			mutex_lock(&bta->lock);
> > >  			if(signal_pending(current)) {
> > > @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static ssize_t btaudio_dsp_read(struct f
> > >  	}
> > >  	mutex_unlock(&bta->lock);
> > >  	remove_wait_queue(&bta->readq, &wait);
> > > -	current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
> > > +	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> >
> > Both lines might be replaced with something like finish_wait().
> 
> care to explain the first one?
> 
> 
> > > --- linux-2.6.20-rc2/sound/oss/cs46xx.c.orig	2006-12-26 00:04:05.000000000 +0100
> > > +++ linux-2.6.20-rc2/sound/oss/cs46xx.c	2006-12-26 00:04:06.000000000 +0100
> > > @@ -1435,7 +1435,7 @@ static int drain_dac(struct cs_state *st
> > >  	for (;;) {
> > >  		/* It seems that we have to set the current state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
> > >  		   every time to make the process really go to sleep */
> > > -		current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
> > > +		__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> > >
> > >  		spin_lock_irqsave(&state->card->lock, flags);
> > >  		count = dmabuf->count;
> > > @@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@ static int drain_dac(struct cs_state *st
> > >
> > >  		if (nonblock) {
> > >  			remove_wait_queue(&dmabuf->wait, &wait);
> > > -			current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
> > > +			__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> >
> > finish_wait()
> 
> same here, the second one is clear

Sorry, in both these cases, I just forgot to snip the earlier bits, new
patch looks much better. Note, that in the case of several OSS drivers,
they are already replaced by ALSA ones -- and the ALSA ones are much
better maintained. A lot of the wait-queue bits in OSS seem to be poorly
done, or more obfuscated than necessary.

Oh well.

Thanks,
Nish

-- 
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] set_current_state usage in oss/
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 04:29:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070103042934.GH14048@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1167089629.11578.2.camel@alice>

On 03.01.2007 [00:23:26 +0100], Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> hi,
> 
> thanks for your comments, i am sorry i
> didnt have time to look at this again until now
> 
> > >  			}
> > >  			mutex_unlock(&bta->lock);
> > > -			current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
> > > +			__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> > >  			schedule();
> > >  			mutex_lock(&bta->lock);
> > >  			if(signal_pending(current)) {
> > > @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static ssize_t btaudio_dsp_read(struct f
> > >  	}
> > >  	mutex_unlock(&bta->lock);
> > >  	remove_wait_queue(&bta->readq, &wait);
> > > -	current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
> > > +	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> >
> > Both lines might be replaced with something like finish_wait().
> 
> care to explain the first one?
> 
> 
> > > --- linux-2.6.20-rc2/sound/oss/cs46xx.c.orig	2006-12-26 00:04:05.000000000 +0100
> > > +++ linux-2.6.20-rc2/sound/oss/cs46xx.c	2006-12-26 00:04:06.000000000 +0100
> > > @@ -1435,7 +1435,7 @@ static int drain_dac(struct cs_state *st
> > >  	for (;;) {
> > >  		/* It seems that we have to set the current state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
> > >  		   every time to make the process really go to sleep */
> > > -		current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
> > > +		__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> > >
> > >  		spin_lock_irqsave(&state->card->lock, flags);
> > >  		count = dmabuf->count;
> > > @@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@ static int drain_dac(struct cs_state *st
> > >
> > >  		if (nonblock) {
> > >  			remove_wait_queue(&dmabuf->wait, &wait);
> > > -			current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
> > > +			__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> >
> > finish_wait()
> 
> same here, the second one is clear

Sorry, in both these cases, I just forgot to snip the earlier bits, new
patch looks much better. Note, that in the case of several OSS drivers,
they are already replaced by ALSA ones -- and the ALSA ones are much
better maintained. A lot of the wait-queue bits in OSS seem to be poorly
done, or more obfuscated than necessary.

Oh well.

Thanks,
Nish

-- 
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-01-03  4:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-25 23:33 [KJ] [PATCH] set_current_state usage in oss/ Eric Sesterhenn
2006-12-25 23:33 ` Eric Sesterhenn
2006-12-26 19:35 ` [KJ] " Nishanth Aravamudan
2006-12-26 19:35   ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-01-02 23:23 ` Eric Sesterhenn
2007-01-02 23:23   ` Eric Sesterhenn
2007-01-03  4:29 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2007-01-03  4:29   ` Nishanth Aravamudan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070103042934.GH14048@us.ibm.com \
    --to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.