From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_debug: illegal blocking memory allocation
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:49:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070105124918.GD11203@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <459DE265.7030100@torque.net>
On Fri, Jan 05 2007, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 04 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 12:21 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> I guess it's fully up to you how you want to solve it. The scheme seems
> >>> a little elaborate, but these error conditions are unlikely to ever been
> >>> seen in the wild, so no objections from me.
> >> Actually, there's already a DID_ code that does what you want. Instead
> >> of DID_ERROR, which will retry immediately, there's DID_REQUEUE which
> >> will halt the device queue and wait for a returning command to retry.
> >
> > As long as it keeps firing the queue at some intervals even without any
> > commands pending at all, then that'll work just fine. I like that
> > approach a lot better than coding the error into some sense value that
> > is (at best) some vague approximation of what has happened (calling
> > memory shortage a transport error is a bit of a stretch).
>
> True, but both happen. The scsi_debug driver is a
> virtual host, virtual target and a lu (ram disk).
> The failure that you pointed out stopped a response
> being built. In the real world that would in the
> target or lu.
The point is that the condition need not be exposed, even if it could be
compared to (say) a device busy condition. Both should just results in a
requeue and later retry, when resources are available to satisfy the
request.
Your revised patch looks good to me!
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-05 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-03 13:49 [PATCH] scsi_debug: illegal blocking memory allocation Jens Axboe
2007-01-04 5:38 ` Douglas Gilbert
2007-01-04 11:21 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-04 15:10 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-04 15:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-01-04 15:34 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-04 15:50 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-05 5:30 ` Douglas Gilbert
2007-01-05 12:49 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070105124918.GD11203@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.