From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: vatsa@in.ibm.com
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gautham shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix-flush_workqueue-vs-cpu_dead-race-update
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 11:11:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070106111117.54bb2307.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070106163851.GA13579@in.ibm.com>
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:08:51 +0530
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> This workqueue problem has exposed a classic example of how
> tough/miserable it can be to write hotplug safe code w/o something like
> lock_cpu_hotplug() ..Are you still inclined towards banning it? :)
I don't ban stuff - I just advocate ;)
I would still prefer that we not try to invent a new magical lock,
but yes, the current approach is looking troublesome.
> FYI, the lock_cpu_hotplug() rewrite proposed by Gautham at
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/26/65 may still need refinement to avoid
> all the kind of deadlocks we have unearthed with workqueue example. I
> can review that design with Gautham if there is some interest to
> revive lock_cpu_hotplug() ..
Has anyone thought seriously about using the process freezer in the
cpu-down/cpu-up paths? That way we don't need to lock anything anywhere?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-06 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-17 22:34 [PATCH, RFC] reimplement flush_workqueue() Oleg Nesterov
2006-12-18 3:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-19 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-19 0:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-12-19 1:00 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 11:32 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-04 14:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-04 15:56 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-04 16:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-04 16:57 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-04 17:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 18:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-04 18:31 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-05 9:03 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-05 14:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-06 15:24 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-05 8:56 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-05 12:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-06 15:11 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-06 15:10 ` [PATCH] fix-flush_workqueue-vs-cpu_dead-race-update Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-06 15:45 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-06 16:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-06 16:38 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-06 17:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-07 10:43 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-07 12:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-07 14:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-07 14:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-07 16:43 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-07 17:01 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-07 17:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-07 17:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-07 16:21 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-07 17:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-06 19:11 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-01-06 19:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-07 11:00 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-07 19:59 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-07 21:01 ` [PATCH] flush_cpu_workqueue: don't flush an empty ->worklist Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-08 23:54 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-09 5:04 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-09 5:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-09 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-09 9:33 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-09 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-09 9:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-09 10:09 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-09 10:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-09 15:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-09 15:59 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-09 16:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-09 16:46 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-09 16:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-14 23:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-15 4:33 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-15 12:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-15 13:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-15 16:18 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-15 16:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-16 5:26 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-16 13:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-17 6:17 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-17 15:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-17 16:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-17 17:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-17 16:25 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-07 21:51 ` [PATCH] fix-flush_workqueue-vs-cpu_dead-race-update Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-08 15:22 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-08 15:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-08 16:31 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-08 17:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-08 18:37 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-01-09 1:11 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-09 4:39 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-09 14:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-08 15:37 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-04 12:02 ` [PATCH, RFC] reimplement flush_workqueue() Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-04 14:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070106111117.54bb2307.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.