* XEN on ARM
@ 2007-01-11 4:22 yong'an liu
2007-01-11 10:33 ` Christoph Egger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: yong'an liu @ 2007-01-11 4:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Hi,ALL:
I working on migrating XEN to ARM.I know that there are quite a lot
of pepole doing the same thing.
Anyone who's doing the same job could contack me.I'll feel lucky to
communicate with you.
Best wishes.
Napobona
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: XEN on ARM
2007-01-11 4:22 XEN on ARM yong'an liu
@ 2007-01-11 10:33 ` Christoph Egger
2007-01-11 13:50 ` David Pilger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Egger @ 2007-01-11 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
On Thursday 11 January 2007 05:22, yong'an liu wrote:
> Hi,ALL:
>
> I working on migrating XEN to ARM.I know that there are quite a lot
> of pepole doing the same thing.
hmm... Xen on a mobile phone or PDA? Cool! One DomU runs WinCE, another DomU
runs Simbian OS, etc. And finally there's a way to encapsulate the Bluetooth
stack. Past 23C3 we know about the security flaws in the protocol itself. :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: XEN on ARM
2007-01-11 10:33 ` Christoph Egger
@ 2007-01-11 13:50 ` David Pilger
2007-01-11 14:32 ` Christoph Egger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Pilger @ 2007-01-11 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Egger; +Cc: xen-devel
It seems like an interesting thing to do?
Does ARM support the ring security levels? or VMX?!?
How are you going to do it?
You must modify the embedded OS, but will it give you real security?
David.
On 1/11/07, Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 11 January 2007 05:22, yong'an liu wrote:
> > Hi,ALL:
> >
> > I working on migrating XEN to ARM.I know that there are quite a lot
> > of pepole doing the same thing.
>
> hmm... Xen on a mobile phone or PDA? Cool! One DomU runs WinCE, another DomU
> runs Simbian OS, etc. And finally there's a way to encapsulate the Bluetooth
> stack. Past 23C3 we know about the security flaws in the protocol itself. :-)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: XEN on ARM
2007-01-11 13:50 ` David Pilger
@ 2007-01-11 14:32 ` Christoph Egger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Egger @ 2007-01-11 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
On Thursday 11 January 2007 14:50, David Pilger wrote:
> It seems like an interesting thing to do?
>
> Does ARM support the ring security levels? or VMX?!?
> How are you going to do it?
Not at all. No time for this. Sorry.
I just thought "loud" about a "Xen on ARM" port.
> You must modify the embedded OS, but will it give you real security?
Depends on design, implementation and on how secure the OS itself is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: dom0 issues with switching from X to console orstarting X
@ 2006-05-31 22:57 Dugger, Donald D
2006-06-01 7:45 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dugger, Donald D @ 2006-05-31 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich, xen-devel
Jan-
If you are running fully virtualized guests then Jun Nakajima fixed a
problem that was put into the Xen unstable tree this morning that was
probably affecting you. The page table entry for page 0 was getting
corrupted after the first fully virtualized guest ran, causing problems
for X. I'd try the latest Xen unstable tree and see if that fixes your
problem.
--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Donald.D.Dugger@intel.com
Ph: (303)440-1368
>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Jan Beulich
>Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 10:05 AM
>To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>Subject: [Xen-devel] dom0 issues with switching from X to
>console orstarting X
>
>We are seeing a number of machines that (simply running dom0)
>either fail to start X (for reasons other than the machine
>in native mode only working via the frame buffer driver) or
>fail to switch from (or back to) X to one of the consoles.
>This normally looks like a hang, though at least in some cases
>it's only X apparently sitting in an endless loop. From
>looking at data so far obtained from these systems this
>appears to be an issue with accessing the video BIOS, in either
>not being to properly run this in vm86 mode (on 32 bits) or
>under emulation (on 64 bits). Has anyone seen similar
>behavior and possibly knows more about this?
>
>Thanks, Jan
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: dom0 issues with switching from X to console orstarting X
2006-05-31 22:57 dom0 issues with switching from X to console orstarting X Dugger, Donald D
@ 2006-06-01 7:45 ` Jan Beulich
2006-06-01 19:09 ` Xen on ARM Philip Reames
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2006-06-01 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Donald D Dugger; +Cc: xen-devel
No - as said in the original description, we see this with solely running dom0. Jan
>>> "Dugger, Donald D" <donald.d.dugger@intel.com> 01.06.06 00:57 >>>
Jan-
If you are running fully virtualized guests then Jun Nakajima fixed a
problem that was put into the Xen unstable tree this morning that was
probably affecting you. The page table entry for page 0 was getting
corrupted after the first fully virtualized guest ran, causing problems
for X. I'd try the latest Xen unstable tree and see if that fixes your
problem.
--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Donald.D.Dugger@intel.com
Ph: (303)440-1368
>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Jan Beulich
>Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 10:05 AM
>To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>Subject: [Xen-devel] dom0 issues with switching from X to
>console orstarting X
>
>We are seeing a number of machines that (simply running dom0)
>either fail to start X (for reasons other than the machine
>in native mode only working via the frame buffer driver) or
>fail to switch from (or back to) X to one of the consoles.
>This normally looks like a hang, though at least in some cases
>it's only X apparently sitting in an endless loop. From
>looking at data so far obtained from these systems this
>appears to be an issue with accessing the video BIOS, in either
>not being to properly run this in vm86 mode (on 32 bits) or
>under emulation (on 64 bits). Has anyone seen similar
>behavior and possibly knows more about this?
>
>Thanks, Jan
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-11 14:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-11 4:22 XEN on ARM yong'an liu
2007-01-11 10:33 ` Christoph Egger
2007-01-11 13:50 ` David Pilger
2007-01-11 14:32 ` Christoph Egger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-31 22:57 dom0 issues with switching from X to console orstarting X Dugger, Donald D
2006-06-01 7:45 ` Jan Beulich
2006-06-01 19:09 ` Xen on ARM Philip Reames
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.