Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known regressions with patches

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 07:32:46AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19
>  > with patches available.
> 
>  > Subject    : KVM: guest crash
>  > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/8/163
>  > Submitter  : Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
>  > Handled-By : Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
>  > Patch      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/9/280
>  > Status     : patch available
> 
> This is not a regression from 2.6.19, since kvm did not exist in
> 2.6.19.  In any case akpm has the patch and plans to merge it for
> 2.6.20 so I don't think anyone has to worry about this one.

I know, but a bug that is not present in 2.6.19 is a regression. ;-)

More seriously, I know it's a bit borderline to talk about a regression, 
but I think listing things like crashes or compile errors in new 
functionality makes sense - especially in such cases where it's about 
tracking that a patch doesn't miss 2.6.20.

>  - R.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed