From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] SUNRPC: RPC buffer size estimates are too large
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:37:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070124203739.GA6587@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070124192020.31133.78494.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 02:20:20PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> @@ -753,25 +751,39 @@ call_reserveresult(struct rpc_task *task
> static void
> call_allocate(struct rpc_task *task)
> {
> + unsigned int slack = task->tk_auth->au_cslack;
> struct rpc_rqst *req = task->tk_rqstp;
> struct rpc_xprt *xprt = task->tk_xprt;
> - unsigned int bufsiz;
> + struct rpc_procinfo *proc = task->tk_msg.rpc_proc;
>
> dprint_status(task);
>
> + task->tk_status = 0;
> task->tk_action = call_bind;
> +
> if (req->rq_buffer)
> return;
>
> - /* FIXME: compute buffer requirements more exactly using
> - * auth->au_wslack */
> - bufsiz = task->tk_msg.rpc_proc->p_bufsiz + RPC_SLACK_SPACE;
> + if (proc->p_proc != 0) {
> + BUG_ON(proc->p_arglen == 0);
> + if (proc->p_decode != NULL)
> + BUG_ON(proc->p_replen == 0);
> + }
>
> - req->rq_buffer = xprt->ops->buf_alloc(task, bufsiz << 1);
> - if (req->rq_buffer != NULL) {
> - req->rq_bufsize = bufsiz;
> + /*
> + * Calculate the size (in quads) of the RPC call
> + * and reply headers, and convert both values
> + * to byte sizes.
> + */
> + req->rq_callsize = RPC_CALLHDRSIZE + (slack << 1) + proc->p_arglen;
> + req->rq_callsize <<= 2;
> + req->rq_rcvsize = RPC_REPHDRSIZE + slack + proc->p_replen;
> + req->rq_rcvsize <<= 2;
What happened to rslack? The callsize calculation should be using
cslack and the rcvsize calculation rslack, I think, right?
In the krb5p case there's an extra annoyance: rslack is used to decide
where to expect page data to start, so it can only take into account
extra space needed at the beginning. But krb5p has to add padding, for
example, to the end of each request.
We could deal with that by setting rslack high enough to take into
account the padding at the end, and then shifting the data back as we
decode, to ensure that the start of the plaintext page data ends up
exactly where rslack would predict it should.
Currently, though, the krb5p code just decrypts in place, and it might
take a little work to get it to do the simultaneous moving and decoding.
--b.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-24 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-24 19:17 [PATCH 00/15] patches for 2.6.21 Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:19 ` [PATCH 01/15] NFS: fix print format for tk_pid Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:19 ` [PATCH 02/15] SUNRPC: fix print format for tk_pid in auth_gss support Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:19 ` [PATCH 03/15] SUNRPC: fix print format for tk_pid Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:19 ` [PATCH 04/15] SUNRPC: Eliminate side effects from rpc_malloc Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:19 ` [PATCH 05/15] SUNRPC: Make rpc_free API more generic Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:19 ` [PATCH 06/15] NFS: disconnect before retrying NFSv4 requests over TCP Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:20 ` [PATCH 07/15] SUNRPC: introduce rpcbind: replacement for in-kernel portmapper Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:20 ` [PATCH 08/15] SUNRPC: switch socket-based RPC transports to use rpcbind Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:20 ` [PATCH 09/15] SUNRPC: switch the RPC server to use the new rpcbind registration API Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:20 ` [PATCH 10/15] NFS: switch NFSROOT to use new rpcbind client Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:20 ` [PATCH 11/15] SUNRPC: remove old portmapper Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:20 ` [PATCH 12/15] SUNRPC: RPC client should retry with different versions of rpcbind Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:20 ` [PATCH 13/15] SUNRPC: RPC buffer size estimates are too large Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 20:37 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2007-01-24 20:41 ` Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 20:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-01-24 21:09 ` Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 21:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-01-24 21:28 ` Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 20:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-01-24 20:50 ` Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 21:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-01-24 21:11 ` Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:20 ` [PATCH 14/15] NLM: Shrink the maximum request size of NLM4 requests Chuck Lever
2007-01-24 19:20 ` [PATCH 15/15] SUNRPC: Debugging aid Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070124203739.GA6587@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.