All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Xen v.s Stable Kernel
@ 2007-01-24 23:22 S.Çağlar Onur
  2007-01-24 23:35 ` Ian Pratt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: S.Çağlar Onur @ 2007-01-24 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 939 bytes --]

Hi All;

I can't find any related discussion on list archives so i just want to learn 
could anybody tell me is there any specific reason not to upgrade 
xen-3.0.4-testing tree to for example 2.6.16.38  which fixes dozens of 
security related problems after .33, i know as a distro packager its my 
responsibility to sync/modify whatever is needed but as an end-user 
perspective i just want to download the newly released stable tarball and use 
my xen powered kernel. And i realize mainline inclusion solves all that 
issues but is it possible to maintain testing trees against its most recent 
stable version to solve these problems until xen merged into mainline and 
releasing minor version against them or am i have to learn live with that :)?

Cheers
-- 
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@pardus.org.tr>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/

Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-24 23:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-24 23:22 Xen v.s Stable Kernel S.Çağlar Onur
2007-01-24 23:35 ` Ian Pratt
2007-01-24 23:45   ` S.Çağlar Onur

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.