From: "Paweł Sikora" <pluto@agmk.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: 2.6.20rc5 k8/acpi regression ( 2.6.17.13 works fine ).
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:54:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200701252154.16723.pluto@agmk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200701242350.45276.lenb@kernel.org>
On Thursday 25 of January 2007 05:50:45 Len Brown wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 January 2007 17:52, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:46:44PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote:
> > > for 2.6.20rc5 i get an acpi related oops during x86-64 boot:
> > > http://minus.ds14.agh.edu.pl/~pluto/2.6.20rc5-acpi-oops.jpg
> > > disabling the "amd-k8 cool'n'quiet" option in bios helps.
> > > moreover, it works fine for 2.6.17.13, so it looks like
> > > a recent regression. i can provide more details if you need.
> >
> > thanks for your report.
> >
> > Can you narrow down a bit when it started?
> > Is 2.6.19 OK?
> > Is 2.6.18 OK?
ok, here are results of my tests:
M/B: http://www.epox.nl/products/view.php?product_id=421
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 55
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3700+
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2200.000
cache size : 1024 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm
3dnowext 3dnow pni lahf_lm
bogomips : 4423.06
TLB size : 1024 4K pages
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp
amd-k8 cool'n'quiet enabled in bios.
2.6.17.13-uni, 2.6.17.14-smp, 2.6.18.6-smp and 2.6.20rc5-uni work.
2.6.20rc5-smp ooopses during boot but works if c'n'q is disabled.
pure 2.6.19.x not tested yet...
> Is the stack trace always the same? It doesn't make much sense to me.
>
> if AMD cool & quiet is enabled in the BIOS, but CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n
> in the kernel, do you see the same problem?
looks like not related to config_cpu_freq.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Paweł Sikora" <pluto@agmk.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: 2.6.20rc5 k8/acpi regression ( 2.6.17.13 works fine ).
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:54:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200701252154.16723.pluto@agmk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200701242350.45276.lenb@kernel.org>
On Thursday 25 of January 2007 05:50:45 Len Brown wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 January 2007 17:52, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:46:44PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote:
> > > for 2.6.20rc5 i get an acpi related oops during x86-64 boot:
> > > http://minus.ds14.agh.edu.pl/~pluto/2.6.20rc5-acpi-oops.jpg
> > > disabling the "amd-k8 cool'n'quiet" option in bios helps.
> > > moreover, it works fine for 2.6.17.13, so it looks like
> > > a recent regression. i can provide more details if you need.
> >
> > thanks for your report.
> >
> > Can you narrow down a bit when it started?
> > Is 2.6.19 OK?
> > Is 2.6.18 OK?
ok, here are results of my tests:
M/B: http://www.epox.nl/products/view.php?product_id=421
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 55
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3700+
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2200.000
cache size : 1024 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm
3dnowext 3dnow pni lahf_lm
bogomips : 4423.06
TLB size : 1024 4K pages
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp
amd-k8 cool'n'quiet enabled in bios.
2.6.17.13-uni, 2.6.17.14-smp, 2.6.18.6-smp and 2.6.20rc5-uni work.
2.6.20rc5-smp ooopses during boot but works if c'n'q is disabled.
pure 2.6.19.x not tested yet...
> Is the stack trace always the same? It doesn't make much sense to me.
>
> if AMD cool & quiet is enabled in the BIOS, but CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n
> in the kernel, do you see the same problem?
looks like not related to config_cpu_freq.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-25 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-24 22:46 2.6.20rc5 k8/acpi regression ( 2.6.17.13 works fine ) Paweł Sikora
2007-01-24 22:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-24 22:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-25 4:50 ` Len Brown
2007-01-25 4:50 ` Len Brown
2007-01-25 4:50 ` Len Brown
2007-01-25 20:54 ` Paweł Sikora [this message]
2007-01-25 20:54 ` Paweł Sikora
2007-01-26 21:57 ` Paweł Sikora
2007-01-25 22:11 ` Paweł Sikora
2007-01-25 22:11 ` Paweł Sikora
2007-01-25 22:11 ` Paweł Sikora
2007-01-29 22:30 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-01-29 22:30 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-01-29 22:30 ` Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200701252154.16723.pluto@agmk.net \
--to=pluto@agmk.net \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.