All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: cleanup release_mem
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:12:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070129181235.GA9063@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070129120100.GA4338@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 07:01:00AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 06:12:44PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > release_mem contains two copies of exactly the same code.  Refactor
> > these into a new helper, release_tty.  The only change in behaviour
> > is that the driver reference count is now decremented after the
> > master tty has been freed instead of before.
> > 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
> 
> Please propogate the mutex_ FIXME comment to both functions as it may
> well need to cover tty->link

Okay.  Now that we get into the details I've also added some renaming,
release_mem becomes release_tty and the new factored out function is
release_one_tty.  The difference is documented in the kdoc comments.


Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/char/tty_io.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/char/tty_io.c	2007-01-29 10:01:46.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/char/tty_io.c	2007-01-29 19:08:06.000000000 +0100
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@
 int tty_ioctl(struct inode * inode, struct file * file,
 	      unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg);
 static int tty_fasync(int fd, struct file * filp, int on);
-static void release_mem(struct tty_struct *tty, int idx);
+static void release_tty(struct tty_struct *tty, int idx);
 
 /**
  *	alloc_tty_struct	-	allocate a tty object
@@ -2003,7 +2003,7 @@
 
 	/* 
 	 * All structures have been allocated, so now we install them.
-	 * Failures after this point use release_mem to clean up, so 
+	 * Failures after this point use release_tty to clean up, so 
 	 * there's no need to null out the local pointers.
 	 */
 	if (!(driver->flags & TTY_DRIVER_DEVPTS_MEM)) {
@@ -2024,8 +2024,8 @@
 
 	/* 
 	 * Structures all installed ... call the ldisc open routines.
-	 * If we fail here just call release_mem to clean up.  No need
-	 * to decrement the use counts, as release_mem doesn't care.
+	 * If we fail here just call release_tty to clean up.  No need
+	 * to decrement the use counts, as release_tty doesn't care.
 	 */
 
 	if (tty->ldisc.open) {
@@ -2095,17 +2095,17 @@
 	retval = -ENOMEM;
 	goto end_init;
 
-	/* call the tty release_mem routine to clean out this slot */
+	/* call the tty release_tty routine to clean out this slot */
 release_mem_out:
 	if (printk_ratelimit())
 		printk(KERN_INFO "init_dev: ldisc open failed, "
 				 "clearing slot %d\n", idx);
-	release_mem(tty, idx);
+	release_tty(tty, idx);
 	goto end_init;
 }
 
 /**
- *	release_mem		-	release tty structure memory
+ *	release_one_tty		-	release tty structure memory
  *
  *	Releases memory associated with a tty structure, and clears out the
  *	driver table slots. This function is called when a device is no longer
@@ -2117,37 +2117,14 @@
  *	of ttys that the driver keeps.
  *		FIXME: should we require tty_mutex is held here ??
  */
-
-static void release_mem(struct tty_struct *tty, int idx)
+static void release_one_tty(struct tty_struct *tty, int idx)
 {
-	struct tty_struct *o_tty;
-	struct ktermios *tp;
 	int devpts = tty->driver->flags & TTY_DRIVER_DEVPTS_MEM;
-
-	if ((o_tty = tty->link) != NULL) {
-		if (!devpts)
-			o_tty->driver->ttys[idx] = NULL;
-		if (o_tty->driver->flags & TTY_DRIVER_RESET_TERMIOS) {
-			tp = o_tty->termios;
-			if (!devpts)
-				o_tty->driver->termios[idx] = NULL;
-			kfree(tp);
-
-			tp = o_tty->termios_locked;
-			if (!devpts)
-				o_tty->driver->termios_locked[idx] = NULL;
-			kfree(tp);
-		}
-		o_tty->magic = 0;
-		o_tty->driver->refcount--;
-		file_list_lock();
-		list_del_init(&o_tty->tty_files);
-		file_list_unlock();
-		free_tty_struct(o_tty);
-	}
+	struct ktermios *tp;
 
 	if (!devpts)
 		tty->driver->ttys[idx] = NULL;
+
 	if (tty->driver->flags & TTY_DRIVER_RESET_TERMIOS) {
 		tp = tty->termios;
 		if (!devpts)
@@ -2160,15 +2137,37 @@
 		kfree(tp);
 	}
 
+
 	tty->magic = 0;
 	tty->driver->refcount--;
+
 	file_list_lock();
 	list_del_init(&tty->tty_files);
 	file_list_unlock();
-	module_put(tty->driver->owner);
+
 	free_tty_struct(tty);
 }
 
+/**
+ *	release_one_tty		-	release tty structure memory
+ *
+ *	Release both @tty and a possible linked partner (think pty pair),
+ *	and decrement the refcount of the backing module.
+ *
+ *	Locking:
+ *		tty_mutex - sometimes only
+ *		takes the file list lock internally when working on the list
+ *	of ttys that the driver keeps.
+ *		FIXME: should we require tty_mutex is held here ??
+ */
+static void release_tty(struct tty_struct *tty, int idx)
+{
+	if (tty->link)
+		release_one_tty(tty->link, idx);
+	release_one_tty(tty, idx);
+	module_put(tty->driver->owner);
+}
+
 /*
  * Even releasing the tty structures is a tricky business.. We have
  * to be very careful that the structures are all released at the
@@ -2436,10 +2435,10 @@
 		tty_set_termios_ldisc(o_tty,N_TTY); 
 	}
 	/*
-	 * The release_mem function takes care of the details of clearing
+	 * The release_tty function takes care of the details of clearing
 	 * the slots and preserving the termios structure.
 	 */
-	release_mem(tty, idx);
+	release_tty(tty, idx);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_UNIX98_PTYS
 	/* Make this pty number available for reallocation */

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-29 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-28 17:12 [PATCH] tty: cleanup release_mem Christoph Hellwig
2007-01-29 12:01 ` Alan Cox
2007-01-29 18:12   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2007-01-29 19:06     ` Alan Cox
2007-01-30  3:56       ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-30  6:33         ` Pekka Enberg
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-31  7:16 Pekka J Enberg
2007-01-31 14:20 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070129181235.GA9063@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=alan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.