From: Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kbuild change breaks the ppc64 build
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:47:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070208124756.GU22699@flower.upol.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17867.1342.763881.188430@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:10:54PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Commit 5de043f4bd11a9e0a3e8daec7d1905da575a76b7 breaks the build on
> 64-bit powerpc because we no longer get the -m64 flag passed to gcc.
> There is code in arch/powerpc/Makefile which adds (or used to add)
> -m64 to AS, LD and CC if we are running on a 64-bit machine (which I
> am) and have a biarch toolchain (which I do). Without -m64, the
> toolchain assumes 32-bit and all sorts of things break spectacularly.
>
> I haven't yet tracked down exactly why this commit has this effect,
> since I find it takes considerable time and effort to understand
> Kbuild.
As i have refactored some CC checking code in Kbuild.include, it
turned, that some versions of `make' after calling nested functions,
add (or leave) prefix whitespace to result, thus ifeq[0] fails:
.-*- (ppc Makefile)
|HAS_BIARCH := $(call cc-option-yn, -m32)
0|ifeq ($(HAS_BIARCH),y)
|AS := $(AS) -a32
|LD := $(LD) -m elf32ppc
|CC := $(CC) -m32
|endif
David wrote and showed a testcase.
Adding $(strip ) wrapper helped with this, but may screw many other
things. Maybe you will help, unless Linus will finally revert this :)
____
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Kbuild change breaks the ppc64 build
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:47:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070208124756.GU22699@flower.upol.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17867.1342.763881.188430@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:10:54PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Commit 5de043f4bd11a9e0a3e8daec7d1905da575a76b7 breaks the build on
> 64-bit powerpc because we no longer get the -m64 flag passed to gcc.
> There is code in arch/powerpc/Makefile which adds (or used to add)
> -m64 to AS, LD and CC if we are running on a 64-bit machine (which I
> am) and have a biarch toolchain (which I do). Without -m64, the
> toolchain assumes 32-bit and all sorts of things break spectacularly.
>
> I haven't yet tracked down exactly why this commit has this effect,
> since I find it takes considerable time and effort to understand
> Kbuild.
As i have refactored some CC checking code in Kbuild.include, it
turned, that some versions of `make' after calling nested functions,
add (or leave) prefix whitespace to result, thus ifeq[0] fails:
.-*- (ppc Makefile)
|HAS_BIARCH := $(call cc-option-yn, -m32)
0|ifeq ($(HAS_BIARCH),y)
|AS := $(AS) -a32
|LD := $(LD) -m elf32ppc
|CC := $(CC) -m32
|endif
David wrote and showed a testcase.
Adding $(strip ) wrapper helped with this, but may screw many other
things. Maybe you will help, unless Linus will finally revert this :)
____
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-08 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-08 11:10 Kbuild change breaks the ppc64 build Paul Mackerras
2007-02-08 11:10 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-02-08 12:00 ` David Miller
2007-02-08 12:00 ` David Miller
2007-02-08 12:35 ` Oleg Verych
2007-02-08 12:35 ` Oleg Verych
2007-02-08 14:12 ` Michal Ostrowski
2007-02-08 14:12 ` Michal Ostrowski
2007-02-08 12:47 ` Oleg Verych [this message]
2007-02-08 12:47 ` Oleg Verych
2007-02-08 13:17 ` David Miller
2007-02-08 13:17 ` David Miller
2007-02-08 13:45 ` final (Re: Kbuild change breaks the ppc64 build) Oleg Verych
2007-02-08 13:45 ` Oleg Verych
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070208124756.GU22699@flower.upol.cz \
--to=olecom@flower.upol.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.