From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] UML hang with 100% CPU
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:22:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070215002205.GA8099@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1HFFeC-0000wJ-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:13:36PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Strangely enough after continuing in gdb, UML is back to normal, and I
> can't make it hang any more. It must be something timing related.
Can you see if the patch below fixes it?
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm/arch/um/os-Linux/sigio.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm.orig/arch/um/os-Linux/sigio.c 2007-02-08 16:48:00.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm/arch/um/os-Linux/sigio.c 2007-02-14 19:16:22.000000000 -0500
@@ -97,20 +97,22 @@ static int write_sigio_thread(void *unus
static int need_poll(struct pollfds *polls, int n)
{
- if(n <= polls->size){
- polls->used = n;
+ struct pollfd *new;
+
+ if(n <= polls->size)
return 0;
- }
- kfree(polls->poll);
- polls->poll = um_kmalloc_atomic(n * sizeof(struct pollfd));
- if(polls->poll == NULL){
+
+ new = um_kmalloc_atomic(n * sizeof(struct pollfd));
+ if(new == NULL){
printk("need_poll : failed to allocate new pollfds\n");
- polls->size = 0;
- polls->used = 0;
return -ENOMEM;
}
+
+ memcpy(new, polls->poll, polls->used * sizeof(struct pollfd));
+ kfree(polls->poll);
+
+ polls->poll = new;
polls->size = n;
- polls->used = n;
return 0;
}
@@ -171,15 +173,15 @@ int add_sigio_fd(int fd)
goto out;
}
- n = current_poll.used + 1;
- err = need_poll(&next_poll, n);
+ n = current_poll.used;
+ err = need_poll(&next_poll, n + 1);
if(err)
goto out;
- for(i = 0; i < current_poll.used; i++)
- next_poll.poll[i] = current_poll.poll[i];
-
- next_poll.poll[n - 1] = *p;
+ memcpy(next_poll.poll, current_poll.poll,
+ current_poll.used * sizeof(struct pollfd));
+ next_poll.poll[n] = *p;
+ next_poll.used = n + 1;
update_thread();
out:
sigio_unlock();
@@ -214,6 +216,7 @@ int ignore_sigio_fd(int fd)
if(p->fd != fd)
next_poll.poll[n++] = *p;
}
+ next_poll.used = current_poll.used - 1;
update_thread();
out:
@@ -331,10 +334,9 @@ void maybe_sigio_broken(int fd, int read
sigio_lock();
err = need_poll(&all_sigio_fds, all_sigio_fds.used + 1);
- if(err){
- printk("maybe_sigio_broken - failed to add pollfd\n");
+ if(err)
goto out;
- }
+
all_sigio_fds.poll[all_sigio_fds.used++] =
((struct pollfd) { .fd = fd,
.events = read ? POLLIN : POLLOUT,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] UML hang with 100% CPU
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:22:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070215002205.GA8099@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1HFFeC-0000wJ-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:13:36PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Strangely enough after continuing in gdb, UML is back to normal, and I
> can't make it hang any more. It must be something timing related.
Can you see if the patch below fixes it?
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm/arch/um/os-Linux/sigio.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm.orig/arch/um/os-Linux/sigio.c 2007-02-08 16:48:00.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm/arch/um/os-Linux/sigio.c 2007-02-14 19:16:22.000000000 -0500
@@ -97,20 +97,22 @@ static int write_sigio_thread(void *unus
static int need_poll(struct pollfds *polls, int n)
{
- if(n <= polls->size){
- polls->used = n;
+ struct pollfd *new;
+
+ if(n <= polls->size)
return 0;
- }
- kfree(polls->poll);
- polls->poll = um_kmalloc_atomic(n * sizeof(struct pollfd));
- if(polls->poll == NULL){
+
+ new = um_kmalloc_atomic(n * sizeof(struct pollfd));
+ if(new == NULL){
printk("need_poll : failed to allocate new pollfds\n");
- polls->size = 0;
- polls->used = 0;
return -ENOMEM;
}
+
+ memcpy(new, polls->poll, polls->used * sizeof(struct pollfd));
+ kfree(polls->poll);
+
+ polls->poll = new;
polls->size = n;
- polls->used = n;
return 0;
}
@@ -171,15 +173,15 @@ int add_sigio_fd(int fd)
goto out;
}
- n = current_poll.used + 1;
- err = need_poll(&next_poll, n);
+ n = current_poll.used;
+ err = need_poll(&next_poll, n + 1);
if(err)
goto out;
- for(i = 0; i < current_poll.used; i++)
- next_poll.poll[i] = current_poll.poll[i];
-
- next_poll.poll[n - 1] = *p;
+ memcpy(next_poll.poll, current_poll.poll,
+ current_poll.used * sizeof(struct pollfd));
+ next_poll.poll[n] = *p;
+ next_poll.used = n + 1;
update_thread();
out:
sigio_unlock();
@@ -214,6 +216,7 @@ int ignore_sigio_fd(int fd)
if(p->fd != fd)
next_poll.poll[n++] = *p;
}
+ next_poll.used = current_poll.used - 1;
update_thread();
out:
@@ -331,10 +334,9 @@ void maybe_sigio_broken(int fd, int read
sigio_lock();
err = need_poll(&all_sigio_fds, all_sigio_fds.used + 1);
- if(err){
- printk("maybe_sigio_broken - failed to add pollfd\n");
+ if(err)
goto out;
- }
+
all_sigio_fds.poll[all_sigio_fds.used++] =
((struct pollfd) { .fd = fd,
.events = read ? POLLIN : POLLOUT,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-15 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-08 18:46 [uml-devel] UML hang with 100% CPU Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-08 18:46 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-08 19:57 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2007-02-08 19:57 ` Jeff Dike
2007-02-08 20:13 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-08 20:13 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-15 0:22 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2007-02-15 0:22 ` Jeff Dike
2007-02-15 10:07 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-15 10:07 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-08 21:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-02-08 21:02 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070215002205.GA8099@ccure.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.