From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: "Ananiev, Leonid I" <leonid.i.ananiev@intel.com>
Cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>,
linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
Suparna bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:50:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070219215048.GI6133@think.oraclecorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B41635854730A14CA71C92B36EC22AAC83B044@mssmsx411>
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:58:16PM +0300, Ananiev, Leonid I wrote:
> > while triggering EIO in invalidate_inode_pages2_range()
> ...
> > With this patch aio-stress sees -EIO.
>
> Actually if invalidate_inode_pages2_range() returns EIO it means
> that internal kernel synchronization conflict was happen.
> It is reported to user as hardware IO error.
> Iteration in synchronization process could be performed instead.
>
aio is not responsible for this particular synchronization. Those fixes
(if we make them) should come from other places. The patch is important
to get aio error handling right.
I would argue that one common cause of the EIO is userland
error (mmap concurrent with O_DIRECT), and EIO is the correct answer.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-19 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-19 20:35 [PATCH] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event Zach Brown
2007-02-19 20:47 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-02-19 21:07 ` Zach Brown
2007-02-19 20:58 ` Ananiev, Leonid I
2007-02-19 21:50 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2007-02-20 0:21 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-02-20 0:26 ` Zach Brown
2007-02-20 0:28 ` Chris Mason
2007-02-20 16:01 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-02-20 16:06 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-02-20 16:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-20 16:19 ` Chris Mason
2007-02-20 16:08 ` Chris Mason
2007-02-20 16:29 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-02-20 16:38 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-02-20 18:40 ` Zach Brown
2007-02-21 0:05 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-02-20 14:08 ` Ananiev, Leonid I
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070219215048.GI6133@think.oraclecorp.com \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=leonid.i.ananiev@intel.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.