From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>, SE Linux <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: I think this is equivalent to what we have now and more efficient.
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:56:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702221156.49050.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45DDBEFA.3050901@redhat.com>
On Thursday 22 February 2007 11:04:10 Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> fp = fopen("/proc/filesystems", "r");
> if (fp == NULL)
> return -1;
This avoids speedups if selinux_mnt already determined that selinux file
system is mounted.
> while ((read = getline(&line, &len, fp)) != -1) {
calls malloc/realloc sometimes. Do we want to use this or just use
fgets_unlocked?
> if (strstr(line, "selinuxfs")) {
> enabled=1;
> break;
> }
> }
check for policy loaded ?
> free(line);
> fclose(fp);
> return enabled;
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-22 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-22 14:36 I think this is equivalent to what we have now and more efficient Daniel J Walsh
2007-02-22 14:45 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-22 15:04 ` Daniel J Walsh
2007-02-22 15:10 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-22 15:36 ` Daniel J Walsh
2007-02-22 15:38 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-22 15:43 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-22 16:04 ` Daniel J Walsh
2007-02-22 16:10 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-22 16:56 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2007-02-23 12:34 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-25 19:36 ` Steve Grubb
2007-02-26 13:55 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-26 14:44 ` Steve Grubb
2007-02-26 14:58 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-26 15:01 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-26 15:11 ` Steve Grubb
2007-02-22 15:46 ` Daniel J Walsh
2007-02-22 15:15 ` Steve Grubb
2007-02-22 15:30 ` Daniel J Walsh
2007-02-22 15:36 ` Stephen Smalley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702221156.49050.sgrubb@redhat.com \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.