All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>, SE Linux <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: I think this is equivalent to what we have now	and	more	efficient.
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:11:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702261011.35277.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1172502070.19041.226.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>

On Monday 26 February 2007 10:01, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > I had a patch for it back in early 2005, called it "loadpolicyvers".
> > But I was only using it for testing, and we didn't have a real user for
> > it at the time.  It would have to be re-based.
>
> Note btw that even if we add this node and add logic to libselinux to
> start using it as an alternative to the getcon() test, we'd still need
> to retain the getcon() test as a fallback for compatibility with older
> kernels.

True.

> So we aren't simplifying the libselinux logic. 

Not now, but we are setting things up to simplify the logic at some future 
point. But more importantly, we finally have a way to see what is really 
loaded. sestatus could be rewritten to use this new node if its available so 
that its more accurate about what's loaded.

-Steve


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-26 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-22 14:36 I think this is equivalent to what we have now and more efficient Daniel J Walsh
2007-02-22 14:45 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-22 15:04   ` Daniel J Walsh
2007-02-22 15:10     ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-22 15:36       ` Daniel J Walsh
2007-02-22 15:38         ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-22 15:43           ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-22 16:04             ` Daniel J Walsh
2007-02-22 16:10               ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-22 16:56               ` Steve Grubb
2007-02-23 12:34                 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-25 19:36                   ` Steve Grubb
2007-02-26 13:55                     ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-26 14:44                       ` Steve Grubb
2007-02-26 14:58                         ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-26 15:01                           ` Stephen Smalley
2007-02-26 15:11                             ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2007-02-22 15:46           ` Daniel J Walsh
2007-02-22 15:15 ` Steve Grubb
2007-02-22 15:30   ` Daniel J Walsh
2007-02-22 15:36     ` Stephen Smalley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200702261011.35277.sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.