From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mbligh@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix sparc TIF_USEDFPU flag atomicity
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:31:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070310163109.GA5901@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070310105903.GA8915@holomorphy.com>
* William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com) wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:26:46 -0800, William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
> >> Oh dear. Could we bit a bit more idiomatic here? For instance,
> >> something like:
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:29:44AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > Ok I pulled the sparc32 patch back out until there is some
> > consensus here :)
>
> It's just a minor touch-up. If Mathieu is okay with it, I'd rather
> leave him as the author and just send along an Acked-by: with it.
> I'm not terribly attached to it, either. I just choked on my soda
> when I saw set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(fpt), TI_USEDFPU)
> etc. go by. (Which reminds me, I really need to figure out how to
> consolidate the UP and SMP cases for all this.)
>
>
> -- wli
Hello,
William's implementation is indeed neater than mine. So the consensus
goes to his patch as far as I'm concerned.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mbligh@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix sparc TIF_USEDFPU flag atomicity
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:31:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070310163109.GA5901@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070310105903.GA8915@holomorphy.com>
* William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com) wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:26:46 -0800, William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
> >> Oh dear. Could we bit a bit more idiomatic here? For instance,
> >> something like:
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:29:44AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > Ok I pulled the sparc32 patch back out until there is some
> > consensus here :)
>
> It's just a minor touch-up. If Mathieu is okay with it, I'd rather
> leave him as the author and just send along an Acked-by: with it.
> I'm not terribly attached to it, either. I just choked on my soda
> when I saw set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(fpt), TI_USEDFPU)
> etc. go by. (Which reminds me, I really need to figure out how to
> consolidate the UP and SMP cases for all this.)
>
>
> -- wli
Hello,
William's implementation is indeed neater than mine. So the consensus
goes to his patch as far as I'm concerned.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-10 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-09 3:12 [PATCH] Fix sparc TIF_USEDFPU flag atomicity Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-03-09 3:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-03-09 5:25 ` David Miller
2007-03-09 5:25 ` David Miller
2007-03-09 11:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-09 11:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-10 8:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-03-10 8:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-03-10 8:26 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-10 8:26 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-10 8:29 ` David Miller
2007-03-10 8:29 ` David Miller
2007-03-10 10:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-10 10:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-10 16:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2007-03-10 16:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-03-10 8:28 ` David Miller
2007-03-10 8:28 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070310163109.GA5901@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.