From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Lumpy Reclaim V5
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:20:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070315192038.82933a2f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <exportbomb.1173723760@pinky>
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:22:45 +0000 Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> wrote:
> Following this email are three patches which represent the
> current state of the lumpy reclaim patches; collectively lumpy V5.
So where do we stand with this now? Does it make anything get better?
I (continue to) think that if this is to be truly useful, we need some way
of using it from kswapd to keep a certain minimum number of order-1,
order-2, etc pages in the freelists.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Lumpy Reclaim V5
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:20:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070315192038.82933a2f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <exportbomb.1173723760@pinky>
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:22:45 +0000 Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> wrote:
> Following this email are three patches which represent the
> current state of the lumpy reclaim patches; collectively lumpy V5.
So where do we stand with this now? Does it make anything get better?
I (continue to) think that if this is to be truly useful, we need some way
of using it from kswapd to keep a certain minimum number of order-1,
order-2, etc pages in the freelists.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-16 3:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-12 18:22 [PATCH 0/3] Lumpy Reclaim V5 Andy Whitcroft
2007-03-12 18:22 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-03-12 18:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] Lumpy Reclaim V4 Andy Whitcroft
2007-03-12 18:23 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-03-12 18:36 ` Dave Hansen
2007-03-12 18:36 ` Dave Hansen
2007-03-12 18:48 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-03-12 18:48 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-03-12 18:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] lumpy: back out removal of active check in isolate_lru_pages Andy Whitcroft
2007-03-12 18:23 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-03-12 18:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] lumpy: only count taken pages as scanned Andy Whitcroft
2007-03-12 18:24 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-03-16 3:20 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-03-16 3:20 ` [PATCH 0/3] Lumpy Reclaim V5 Andrew Morton
2007-03-17 13:27 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-03-17 13:27 ` Andy Whitcroft
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070315192038.82933a2f.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.