From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [ PATCH 0/7 ] UML - Header cleanup
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:50:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070322095034.51a16aa5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070322160640.GA6992@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:06:40 -0400 Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> wrote:
> These are post-2.6.21 material, except that if the new definition of
> ARRAY_SIZE goes to Linus, patch 1 in this series should go as well.
I have the ARRAY_SIZE change queued for 2.6.22.
It looks like the UML change needs to be folded into the same changeset to
avoid build breaks?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [ PATCH 0/7 ] UML - Header cleanup
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:50:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070322095034.51a16aa5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070322160640.GA6992@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:06:40 -0400 Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> wrote:
> These are post-2.6.21 material, except that if the new definition of
> ARRAY_SIZE goes to Linus, patch 1 in this series should go as well.
I have the ARRAY_SIZE change queued for 2.6.22.
It looks like the UML change needs to be folded into the same changeset to
avoid build breaks?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-22 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-22 16:06 [uml-devel] [ PATCH 0/7 ] UML - Header cleanup Jeff Dike
2007-03-22 16:06 ` Jeff Dike
2007-03-22 17:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-03-22 17:50 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-22 19:29 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2007-03-22 19:29 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070322095034.51a16aa5.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.