All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] only allow nonlinear vmas for ram backed filesystems
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:00:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070325160050.fe7cb284.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1HVEQJ-0006gF-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>

On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:09:19 +0100 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:

> Dirty page accounting/limiting doesn't work for nonlinear mappings,

Doesn't it?  iirc the problem is that we don't correctly re-clean the ptes
while starting writeout.  And the dirty-page accounting is in fact correct
(it'd darn well better be).

> so
> for non-ram backed filesystems emulate with linear mappings.  This
> retains ABI compatibility with previous kernels at minimal code cost.
> 
> All known users of nonlinear mappings actually use tmpfs, so this
> shouldn't have any negative effect.

Unless someone is using remap_file_pages() against an ext3 file, in which
case their application stops working?

That would be a problem.  These guys:
http://www.technovelty.org/code/linux/fremap.html, for example, will be in
for a little surprise.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] only allow nonlinear vmas for ram backed filesystems
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:00:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070325160050.fe7cb284.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1HVEQJ-0006gF-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>

On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:09:19 +0100 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:

> Dirty page accounting/limiting doesn't work for nonlinear mappings,

Doesn't it?  iirc the problem is that we don't correctly re-clean the ptes
while starting writeout.  And the dirty-page accounting is in fact correct
(it'd darn well better be).

> so
> for non-ram backed filesystems emulate with linear mappings.  This
> retains ABI compatibility with previous kernels at minimal code cost.
> 
> All known users of nonlinear mappings actually use tmpfs, so this
> shouldn't have any negative effect.

Unless someone is using remap_file_pages() against an ext3 file, in which
case their application stops working?

That would be a problem.  These guys:
http://www.technovelty.org/code/linux/fremap.html, for example, will be in
for a little surprise.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-26  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-24 22:07 [patch 1/3] split mmap Miklos Szeredi
2007-03-24 22:07 ` Miklos Szeredi, Miklos Szeredi
2007-03-24 22:09 ` [patch 2/3] only allow nonlinear vmas for ram backed filesystems Miklos Szeredi
2007-03-24 22:09   ` Miklos Szeredi, Miklos Szeredi
2007-03-25 12:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-25 12:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-25 15:51     ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-25 15:51       ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-27  0:02       ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-27  0:02         ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-26  0:00   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-03-26  0:00     ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-26  6:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-26  6:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-24 22:11 ` [patch 3/3] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write Miklos Szeredi
2007-03-24 22:11   ` Miklos Szeredi, Miklos Szeredi
2007-03-25 12:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-25 12:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-25 21:08     ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-03-25 21:08       ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-03-25 12:12 ` [patch 1/3] split mmap Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-25 12:12   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070325160050.fe7cb284.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.