Re: numa=on broken

[Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>]

* Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com> [2007-03-30 13:46]:
> * Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com> [2007-03-30 13:36]:
> > * Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk> [2007-03-30 13:17]:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 30/3/07 19:08, "Ryan Harper" <ryanh@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > >> So -- can we ensure that the node that owns low memory is node zero?
> > > > 
> > > > AFAIK, that is the case, look at the SRAT table:
> > > > 
> > > > (XEN) SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 0-a0000
> > > > (XEN) SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 0-e0000000
> > > > (XEN) SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 100000000-200000000
> > > 
> > > What if you move end_boot_allocator() to just before 'early_boot = 0' in
> > > arch/x86/setup.c?
> > 
> > Giving that a shot.  
> 
> Didn't work, just pushes the bubble back to allocating the array for
> NODE0:

Ah, top of end_boot_allocator assings avail[0] to avail0.  Looks like
there is some heap/avail initiliazation that needs to be done
seperately.



-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@us.ibm.com