Re: numa=on broken

[Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>]

* Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk> [2007-03-30 13:52]:
> 
> 
> 
> On 30/3/07 19:46, "Ryan Harper" <ryanh@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > That is, we are still dying in init_heap_pages(), but this time for
> > allocating avail[0] rather than avail[1].
> 
> In addition to that change in x86/setup.c, move the first three lines of
> code from end_boot_allocator() into init_xenheap_pages() (these are the ones
> that actually set up the statically allocated node0 metadata). If that works
> I'll sort out a clean fix.
> 
> This is just a simple exercise in code shuffling. :-)

Giving that try right now, let you know in a fewl.

I would have rather had the folks who changed the code actually test
with numa=on.

What are you thoughts about turning numa on by default or at least
getting a numa=on run on a two-socket opteron in the xen-rt regressions.

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@us.ibm.com