[PATCH 0/9] DCCP: Revised patchset

[PATCH 0/9] DCCP: Revised patchset

[Ian McDonald]

This is a revised set of patches sent from yesterday taking into account
Gerrit's feedback.

This should allow his patches to be applied. Patches don't change
functionality except patch 9 which renames slab. This can be omitted if
desired by Arnaldo given his past feedback.

Also online at http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/dccp/patches22/ - all.tgz has whole set

Re: [PATCH 0/9] DCCP: Revised patchset

[Gerrit Renker]

|  This is a revised set of patches sent from yesterday
Thank you for the update. I went through each patch again and it blends in
fine with the set of patches that follow.

Many patches are later overridden, so only the copyright patch stands out
clearly. The other patches are `overlaid' because

 * there is a new loss interval history which allocates on-demand. This
   has been rewritten and deals with loss intervals < 8 (as per announcement);
 * the loss detection has been rewritten from scratch and (not boasting)
   deals with losses of the same window / re-ordering / recycling of loss history /
   loss burst (also as per earlier email)

Test modules can be supplied for the new infrastructure, which I'd submit tomorrow
or the day after if this is ok.
(Info page: http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/docs/ccid3_packet_reception/ )

Many thanks
Gerrit

Re: [PATCH 0/9] DCCP: Revised patchset

[Ian McDonald]

On 4/3/07, Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
> |  This is a revised set of patches sent from yesterday
> Thank you for the update. I went through each patch again and it blends in
> fine with the set of patches that follow.
>
> Many patches are later overridden, so only the copyright patch stands out
> clearly. The other patches are `overlaid' because
>
Yes I'm fine with that. The only purpose for this patchset really in
the end is so Arnaldo can apply your patches!
-- 
Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/
Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz
WAND Network Research Group