All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	tee@sgi.com, holt@sgi.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] no ZERO_PAGE?
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:48:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070404154839.GI19587@v2.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704040830500.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 08:35:30AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Anyway, I'm not against this, but I can see somebody actually *wanting* 
> the ZERO page in some cases. I've used the fact for TLB testing, for 
> example, by just doing a big malloc(), and knowing that the kernel will 
> re-use the ZERO_PAGE so that I don't get any cache effects (well, at least 
> not any *physical* cache effects. Virtually indexed cached will still show 
> effects of it, of course, but I haven't cared).

Ok, those cases wanting the same zero page, could be fairly easily
converted to an mmap over /dev/zero (without having to run 4k large
mmap syscalls or nonlinear).

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	tee@sgi.com, holt@sgi.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] no ZERO_PAGE?
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:48:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070404154839.GI19587@v2.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704040830500.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 08:35:30AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Anyway, I'm not against this, but I can see somebody actually *wanting* 
> the ZERO page in some cases. I've used the fact for TLB testing, for 
> example, by just doing a big malloc(), and knowing that the kernel will 
> re-use the ZERO_PAGE so that I don't get any cache effects (well, at least 
> not any *physical* cache effects. Virtually indexed cached will still show 
> effects of it, of course, but I haven't cared).

Ok, those cases wanting the same zero page, could be fairly easily
converted to an mmap over /dev/zero (without having to run 4k large
mmap syscalls or nonlinear).

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-04 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-29  7:58 [rfc][patch 1/2] mm: dont account ZERO_PAGE Nick Piggin
2007-03-29  7:58 ` [rfc][patch 2/2] mips: reinstate move_pte Nick Piggin
2007-03-29 17:49   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-29 13:10 ` [rfc][patch 1/2] mm: dont account ZERO_PAGE Hugh Dickins
2007-03-30  1:46   ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-30  2:59     ` Robin Holt
2007-03-30  3:09       ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-30  9:23         ` Robin Holt
2007-03-30  2:40   ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-04  3:37     ` [rfc] no ZERO_PAGE? Nick Piggin
2007-04-04  3:37       ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-04  9:45       ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-04  9:45         ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-04 10:24         ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-04 10:24           ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-04 12:27           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 12:27             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 13:55             ` Dan Aloni
2007-04-04 13:55               ` Dan Aloni
2007-04-04 14:14               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 14:14                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 14:44                 ` Dan Aloni
2007-04-04 14:44                   ` Dan Aloni
2007-04-04 15:03                   ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-04 15:03                     ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-04 15:34                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 15:34                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 15:41                       ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-04 15:41                         ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-04 16:07                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 16:07                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 16:14                         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-04 16:14                           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-04 15:27                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 15:27                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 16:15                     ` Dan Aloni
2007-04-04 16:15                       ` Dan Aloni
2007-04-04 16:48                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 16:48                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 12:45           ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-04 12:45             ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-04 13:05             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 13:05               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 13:32               ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-04 13:32                 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-04 13:40                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 13:40                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 15:35       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-04 15:35         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-04 15:48         ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2007-04-04 15:48           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 16:09           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-04 16:09             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-04 16:23             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 16:23               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 16:10           ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-04 16:10             ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-04 16:31             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 16:31               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 22:07           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-04-04 16:32         ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-04 16:32           ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-04 17:02           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-04 17:02             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-04 19:15         ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-04 19:15           ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-04 20:11         ` David Miller
2007-04-04 20:11           ` David Miller, Linus Torvalds
2007-04-04 20:50           ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-04 20:50             ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-05  2:03           ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05  2:03             ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05  5:23           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-05  5:23             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-04-04 22:05         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-04-05  0:27           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-05  0:27             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-05  1:25             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-04-05  2:30             ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05  2:30               ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05  5:37               ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-05  5:37                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-05 17:23                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-04-05  4:47         ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05  4:47           ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070404154839.GI19587@v2.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=holt@sgi.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=tee@sgi.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.