From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 00:38:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070406223821.GL29169@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4616CA22.7040005@tmr.com>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:30:58PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
> >
> It would be really nice, when removing features used on computers which
> are only a few years old, if you noted what replaces this functionality.
> Yes, people can take 10-15 minutes to find and read previous discussion,
> but one or two sentences who generate less concern and noise on the list.
For everyone on linux-kernel, the text my patch removes in
feature-removal-schedule.txt should be sufficient.
Users already had a printk() stating that it was deprecated.
> Bill Davidsen
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
davej@codemonkey.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 00:38:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070406223821.GL29169@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4616CA22.7040005@tmr.com>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:30:58PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
> >
> It would be really nice, when removing features used on computers which
> are only a few years old, if you noted what replaces this functionality.
> Yes, people can take 10-15 minutes to find and read previous discussion,
> but one or two sentences who generate less concern and noise on the list.
For everyone on linux-kernel, the text my patch removes in
feature-removal-schedule.txt should be sufficient.
Users already had a printk() stating that it was deprecated.
> Bill Davidsen
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-06 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-20 0:06 [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI Adrian Bunk
2007-02-20 0:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-02-24 14:20 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-02-24 14:20 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-04-06 22:30 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-04-06 22:30 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-04-06 22:38 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-04-06 22:38 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-06 10:19 Adrian Bunk
2007-04-06 10:29 ` Dave Jones
2007-04-06 10:29 ` Dave Jones
2007-04-06 10:38 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-06 10:38 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-06 10:46 ` Dave Jones
2007-04-06 10:46 ` Dave Jones
2007-07-01 20:20 Adrian Bunk
2007-07-02 23:22 ` Dave Jones
2007-07-02 23:22 ` Dave Jones
2007-07-02 23:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-03 0:36 ` Dave Jones
2007-07-03 1:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-03 1:13 ` Dave Jones
2007-07-08 21:39 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070406223821.GL29169@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.