All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Pte xchg optimization.patch
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:18:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070412181809.GC25646@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704120530.l3C5UweV022834@zach-dev.vmware.com>

On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:30:58PM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
 > In situations where page table updates need only be made locally, and there
 > is no cross-processor A/D bit races involved, we need not use the heavyweight
 > xchg instruction to atomically fetch and clear page table entries.  Instead,
 > we can just read and clear them directly.
 > 
 > This introduces a neat optimization for non-SMP kernels; drop the atomic
 > xchg operations from page table updates.

Would it be feasible to do this using the smp_alternatives stuff?
Given many distros are now shipping SMP-only kernels, it'd be nice
to get that win without using having to rebuild their kernels.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@vmware.com>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Pte xchg optimization.patch
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:18:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070412181809.GC25646@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704120530.l3C5UweV022834@zach-dev.vmware.com>

On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:30:58PM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
 > In situations where page table updates need only be made locally, and there
 > is no cross-processor A/D bit races involved, we need not use the heavyweight
 > xchg instruction to atomically fetch and clear page table entries.  Instead,
 > we can just read and clear them directly.
 > 
 > This introduces a neat optimization for non-SMP kernels; drop the atomic
 > xchg operations from page table updates.

Would it be feasible to do this using the smp_alternatives stuff?
Given many distros are now shipping SMP-only kernels, it'd be nice
to get that win without using having to rebuild their kernels.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-12 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-12  5:30 [PATCH 3/4] Pte xchg optimization.patch Zachary Amsden
2007-04-12 18:18 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2007-04-12 18:18   ` Dave Jones
2007-04-12 18:44   ` Zachary Amsden

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070412181809.GC25646@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=zach@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.