From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: dccp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/29] Use skb timestamp for receiver side
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:27:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704131027.16739@strip-the-willow> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070412211454.GH21292@ghostprotocols.net>
Sorry, I misread the email. Please see below.
| You want the scheduling delays and other issues that can
| delay DCCP input packet processing to get factored into
| the RTT, so that the sender will pace properly.
|
| Trying to get perfect timestamping and RTT measurements,
| and ignoring scheduling delays, is quite foolhardy and shows
| a lack of understanding of how queueing really works.
CCID3 uses the sampled RTT value as input into an equation so any
inaccuracies will multiply. I observed a difference of about 10.
Currently the performance of CCID3 severely sucks and I tried every
bit to make it better. Obviously this is not the right way.
Your comments are helpful, thank you.
I will revert all RX/TX timestamps and I think there is no need to
take the timestamp in the dccp receive input function.
By taking the timestamp in the CCID3 handler, it will include all
processing overhead, slowing the sending rate further down in proportion
to that difference.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-13 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-12 21:14 [PATCH 07/29] Use skb timestamp for receiver side Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-04-12 21:22 ` David Miller
2007-04-12 21:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-04-12 21:50 ` Ian McDonald
2007-04-12 21:57 ` David Miller
2007-04-12 23:27 ` Ian McDonald
2007-04-13 8:59 ` Gerrit Renker
2007-04-13 9:01 ` Gerrit Renker
2007-04-13 9:27 ` Gerrit Renker [this message]
2007-04-13 9:37 ` David Miller
2007-04-13 9:48 ` Ian McDonald
2007-04-13 9:51 ` Gerrit Renker
2007-04-13 9:53 ` Gerrit Renker
2007-04-13 10:20 ` Gerrit Renker
2007-04-13 11:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-04-13 12:11 ` Gerrit Renker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704131027.16739@strip-the-willow \
--to=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.