All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@sw.ru>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	devel@openvz.org, Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Show slab memory usage on OOM and SysRq-M
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:07:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070418140752.02084f34.dada1@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704180915520.11160@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:17:19 +0300 (EEST)
Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > This nr_pages should be in struct kmem_list3, not in struct kmem_cache, 
> > or else you defeat NUMA optimizations if touching a field in kmem_cache 
> > at kmem_getpages()/kmem_freepages() time.
> 
> We already touch ->flags, ->gfpflags, and ->gfporder in kmem_getpages(). 
> Sorry for my ignorance, but how is this different?
> 

Those fields are read. Thats OK, because several CPUS might share all those without problem.

But modifying one field in kmem_cache would invalidate one cache line for all cpus that would have to reload it later.

This is what we call "false sharing" or cache line ping pongs



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@sw.ru>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	devel@openvz.org, Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Show slab memory usage on OOM and SysRq-M
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:07:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070418140752.02084f34.dada1@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704180915520.11160@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:17:19 +0300 (EEST)
Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > This nr_pages should be in struct kmem_list3, not in struct kmem_cache, 
> > or else you defeat NUMA optimizations if touching a field in kmem_cache 
> > at kmem_getpages()/kmem_freepages() time.
> 
> We already touch ->flags, ->gfpflags, and ->gfporder in kmem_getpages(). 
> Sorry for my ignorance, but how is this different?
> 

Those fields are read. Thats OK, because several CPUS might share all those without problem.

But modifying one field in kmem_cache would invalidate one cache line for all cpus that would have to reload it later.

This is what we call "false sharing" or cache line ping pongs


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-18 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-17 12:55 [PATCH] Show slab memory usage on OOM and SysRq-M Pavel Emelianov
2007-04-17 12:55 ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-04-17 13:22 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-04-17 13:22   ` Pekka Enberg
2007-04-17 13:50   ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-04-17 13:50     ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-04-17 14:02     ` Pekka J Enberg
2007-04-17 14:02       ` Pekka J Enberg
2007-04-17 14:21       ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-04-17 14:21         ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-04-17 15:12   ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-17 15:12     ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-18  6:17     ` Pekka J Enberg
2007-04-18  6:17       ` Pekka J Enberg
2007-04-18 12:07       ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2007-04-18 12:07         ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070418140752.02084f34.dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dev@openvz.org \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=xemul@sw.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.