From: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, ema@debian.org
Subject: Re: Major qla2xxx regression on sparc64
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:28:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070418172802.GD12708@andrew-vasquezs-computer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070418171346.GA16471@infradead.org>
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I don't think a module option is a good idea at this point. The problem
> is you broke some so far perfectly working setups, which is not okay.
> The only first step can be printing a really big warning. After this
> has been in for a while (at lest half a year) we can make it a non-default
> option or turn if off completely in case the warning never triggered in
> practice.
>
> The only resonable thing for 2.6.21 is to put in David's patch, possible
> with an even more drastic warning when the rom is invalid and there's
> no prom-fallback available.
>
> Note that I expect Sun put in the invalid ROM intentionally, as we have
> similar cases with other cards that have totally messed up ROMs in
> Sun-branded versions. Personally I think that's an utterly bad decision
> from Sun's side, but we'll have to live with this.
Fine. I'll rework an alternate patch for the 2.6.22 timeframe...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-18 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-16 8:02 Major qla2xxx regression on sparc64 David Miller
2007-04-16 16:37 ` Andrew Vasquez
2007-04-16 19:37 ` David Miller
2007-04-16 19:59 ` David Miller
2007-04-16 20:08 ` Andrew Vasquez
2007-04-16 21:10 ` Andrew Vasquez
2007-04-16 22:08 ` David Miller
2007-04-16 22:25 ` Andrew Vasquez
2007-04-16 22:29 ` David Miller
2007-04-16 23:28 ` Andrew Vasquez
2007-04-16 23:41 ` David Miller
2007-04-16 23:47 ` Andrew Vasquez
2007-04-17 0:05 ` David Miller
2007-04-17 2:41 ` Andrew Vasquez
2007-04-17 5:02 ` David Miller
2007-04-17 18:28 ` Seokmann Ju
2007-04-17 18:28 ` Seokmann Ju
2007-04-17 18:56 ` David Miller
2007-04-18 17:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-18 20:12 ` David Miller
2007-04-18 17:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-18 17:28 ` Andrew Vasquez [this message]
2007-04-18 20:13 ` David Miller
2007-04-19 17:15 ` Andrew Vasquez
2007-04-18 20:10 ` David Miller
2007-04-22 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070418172802.GD12708@andrew-vasquezs-computer.local \
--to=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ema@debian.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.