From: Peter Baumann <waste.manager@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [BUG] git-new-workdir doesn't understand packed refs
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:31:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070418183156.GF5913@xp.machine.xx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vlkgph7i0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 11:17:43AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Peter Baumann <waste.manager@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:23:14AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >>
> >> Recursively dereferencing the symbolic link by hand to a limit
> >> to avoid infinite recursion (error out when we reach the limit)
> >> would be a more elaborate solution that probably is the right
> >> thing to do.
> >>
> > I thought about the case where packed-refs is a symlink to another symlink
> > and then decided that it's not worth to implement this because a workdir
> > should be linked to a _repo_ and not another workdir.
>
> That's incredibly weak, as the initial motivation of this patch
> is that you did not want to say "you should run gc only in the
> _repo_ not in workdir".
>
Yes. That's my motivation and it works right now
git init a
<hack, hack, hack,>
git commit -a
git-new-workdir a b # allowed
git-new-workdir a c # allowed
git-new-workdir b d # NOT ALLOWED
The user should only create new work dirs which refere to the repo and not
to another workdir.
But *iff* thats the only point for keeping my patch out I'll fix it, but
not tonight. (Leaving now ...)
-Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-18 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-17 16:17 [BUG] git-new-workdir doesn't understand packed refs Peter Baumann
2007-04-17 21:55 ` Julian Phillips
2007-04-18 5:52 ` Peter Baumann
2007-04-18 7:26 ` Julian Phillips
2007-04-18 7:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-18 8:11 ` Peter Baumann
2007-04-18 11:55 ` Julian Phillips
2007-04-18 16:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-18 17:43 ` Peter Baumann
2007-04-18 18:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-18 18:31 ` Peter Baumann [this message]
2007-04-18 18:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-18 21:08 ` Peter Baumann
2007-04-18 21:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-19 5:35 ` [PATCH] Add test for symlinked .git/packed-refs Peter Baumann
2007-04-19 6:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-20 16:52 ` [PATCH] pack-refs: dereference .git/packed-refs if it is a symlink Peter Baumann
2007-04-21 20:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-18 18:43 ` [BUG] git-new-workdir doesn't understand packed refs Julian Phillips
2007-04-18 10:28 ` [PATCH] pack-refs: dereference .git/packed-refs if it is a symlink Peter Baumann
2007-04-18 16:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-18 17:47 ` Peter Baumann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070418183156.GF5913@xp.machine.xx \
--to=waste.manager@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=julian@quantumfyre.co.uk \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.