From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Petr Vandrovec <petr@vmware.com>,
Chaz Masden <zamsden@gmail.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Paravirt: fix export of paravirt-ops to binary modules
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:34:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704201134.42116.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070420015214.6834BBFC@zach-dev2.vmware.com>
On Friday 20 April 2007 03:52:14 Zachary Amsden wrote:
> A clever set of manipulations allows us to fix binary modules with paravirt-ops
> by just not exporting paravirt_ops at all and using the new patching code.
>
> What do you think? Experimental patches here... only partially tested, but
> booting and appear to be a working prototype.
Basic idea looks good.
But is the 5 argument support really needed? I don't see any paravirt
ops functions that needs it and even if there was one it still wouldn't be clear
if it made sense to export it.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-20 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-20 1:52 [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Paravirt: fix export of paravirt-ops to binary modules Zachary Amsden
2007-04-20 9:34 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-04-20 15:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-20 21:25 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-04-20 21:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-20 21:36 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-04-20 23:01 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-20 23:02 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-04-22 23:37 ` Rusty Russell
2007-04-22 23:49 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-23 0:24 ` Rusty Russell
2007-04-23 0:49 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-23 1:04 ` Rusty Russell
2007-04-23 21:18 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-04-23 1:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704201134.42116.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=petr@vmware.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=zamsden@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.