From: Valerie Henson <val_henson@linux.intel.com>
To: Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>
Cc: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>,
Amit Gud <gud@cis.ksu.edu>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
riel@surriel.com, zab@zabbo.net, arjan@infradead.org,
suparna@in.ibm.com, brandon@ifup.org, karunasagark@gmail.com,
gud@ksu.edu
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:47:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070425224710.GB16129@nifty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17967.15531.450627.972572@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:34:03PM +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote:
>
> What is more important, design puts (as far as I can see) no upper limit
> on the number of continuation inodes, and hence, even if _average_ fsck
> time is greatly reduced, occasionally it can take more time than ext2 of
> the same size. This is clearly unacceptable in many situations (HA,
> etc.).
Actually, there is an upper limit on the number of continuation
inodes. Each file can have a maximum of one continuation inode per
chunk. (This is why we need to support sparse files.)
-VAL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-25 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-23 11:21 [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck Amit Gud
[not found] ` <17965.6084 1.900376.524639@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
2007-04-23 16:28 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2007-04-23 15:25 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-23 16:32 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2007-04-24 11:44 ` Nikita Danilov
2007-04-24 18:27 ` David Lang
2007-04-24 19:34 ` Nikita Danilov
2007-04-24 19:26 ` David Lang
2007-04-25 11:34 ` Nikita Danilov
2007-04-25 16:39 ` David Lang
2007-04-25 22:47 ` Valerie Henson [this message]
2007-04-26 14:14 ` Jeff Dike
2007-04-26 15:53 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-26 16:05 ` Jeff Dike
2007-04-26 16:56 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-27 4:58 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-27 15:06 ` Jeff Dike
2007-05-01 17:26 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-26 16:11 ` Alan Cox
2007-04-26 16:44 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-24 21:53 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-25 10:54 ` David Chinner
2007-04-25 11:38 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-04-25 17:52 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-25 23:06 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-25 23:03 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-26 0:47 ` David Chinner
2007-04-26 22:21 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-26 22:21 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-26 8:47 ` Jan Kara
2007-04-27 5:07 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-27 10:53 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-27 10:53 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-28 6:50 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-28 10:03 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-28 10:03 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-25 22:43 ` Valerie Henson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070425224710.GB16129@nifty \
--to=val_henson@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=brandon@ifup.org \
--cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=gud@cis.ksu.edu \
--cc=gud@ksu.edu \
--cc=karunasagark@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikita@clusterfs.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=zab@zabbo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.