From: Amit Gud <gud@ksu.edu>
To: suparna@in.ibm.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
val_henson@linux.intel.com, riel@surriel.com, zab@zabbo.net,
arjan@infradead.org, brandon@ifup.org, karunasagark@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:25:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <462CCFD8.2040907@ksu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070423162849.GB14113@in.ibm.com>
Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
> Could you send this out as a patch to ext2 codebase, so we can just look
> at the changes for chunkfs ? That might also make it small enough
> to inline your patch in email for review.
>
> What kind of results are you planning to gather to evaluate/optimize this ?
>
Mainly I'm trying to gather following:
- Graph of continuation inodes vs. the file system fragmentation (or
aging) factor with varying configurations of chunk sizes
- Graph of wall clock time vs. disk size + data on the disk with both
chunkfs and native ext2, and/or other file systems
AG
--
May the source be with you.
http://www.cis.ksu.edu/~gud
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-23 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-23 11:21 [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck Amit Gud
[not found] ` <17965.6084 1.900376.524639@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
2007-04-23 16:28 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2007-04-23 15:25 ` Amit Gud [this message]
2007-04-23 16:32 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2007-04-24 11:44 ` Nikita Danilov
2007-04-24 18:27 ` David Lang
2007-04-24 19:34 ` Nikita Danilov
2007-04-24 19:26 ` David Lang
2007-04-25 11:34 ` Nikita Danilov
2007-04-25 16:39 ` David Lang
2007-04-25 22:47 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-26 14:14 ` Jeff Dike
2007-04-26 15:53 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-26 16:05 ` Jeff Dike
2007-04-26 16:56 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-27 4:58 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-27 15:06 ` Jeff Dike
2007-05-01 17:26 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-26 16:11 ` Alan Cox
2007-04-26 16:44 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-24 21:53 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-25 10:54 ` David Chinner
2007-04-25 11:38 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-04-25 17:52 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-25 23:06 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-25 23:03 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-26 0:47 ` David Chinner
2007-04-26 22:21 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-26 22:21 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-26 8:47 ` Jan Kara
2007-04-27 5:07 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-27 10:53 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-27 10:53 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-28 6:50 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-28 10:03 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-28 10:03 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-25 22:43 ` Valerie Henson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=462CCFD8.2040907@ksu.edu \
--to=gud@ksu.edu \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=brandon@ifup.org \
--cc=karunasagark@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=val_henson@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zab@zabbo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.