From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Horms <horms@verge.net.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Jurriaan <thunder7@xs4all.nl>,
Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>,
vgoyal@in.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header.
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 08:25:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070501062554.GT25929@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1zm4pyuzp.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:26:50PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> writes:
>
>
> >> At least without a core file it is working on with gdb 6.4.
> >>
> >
> > This seems to be a problem with gdb 6.5. I transferred the dump to a
> > different machine having GNU gdb 6.4, and it works fine there.
>
> Ok. The difference between those two symbols didn't seem to make
> any sense, so a gdb bug makes sense.
>
> Cool. Then the patch is good. :)
It would still make any gdb 6.5 users unhappy. If no workaround can be found
I guess we'll need a CONFIG of some sort?
-Andi
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: vgoyal@in.ibm.com, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jurriaan <thunder7@xs4all.nl>,
Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>,
Horms <horms@verge.net.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header.
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 08:25:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070501062554.GT25929@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1zm4pyuzp.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:26:50PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> writes:
>
>
> >> At least without a core file it is working on with gdb 6.4.
> >>
> >
> > This seems to be a problem with gdb 6.5. I transferred the dump to a
> > different machine having GNU gdb 6.4, and it works fine there.
>
> Ok. The difference between those two symbols didn't seem to make
> any sense, so a gdb bug makes sense.
>
> Cool. Then the patch is good. :)
It would still make any gdb 6.5 users unhappy. If no workaround can be found
I guess we'll need a CONFIG of some sort?
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-01 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-30 15:12 [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-30 15:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-30 15:17 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-30 15:17 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-01 3:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-01 3:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-01 4:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01 4:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01 5:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-01 5:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-01 5:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01 5:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01 6:25 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-05-01 6:25 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-01 5:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01 5:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01 6:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-01 6:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-28 10:54 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-05-28 10:54 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-05-28 11:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-28 11:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-28 14:39 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-05-28 14:39 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-06-01 12:26 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-06-01 12:26 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-05-28 14:57 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-28 14:57 ` Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-31 7:53 2.6.21-rc5-mm3 - no boot, "address not 2M aligned" Andrew Morton
2007-04-01 5:29 ` thunder7
2007-04-01 6:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-01 6:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-02 7:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-02 8:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-02 9:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-02 17:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-03 4:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-03 5:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-03 10:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-23 5:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-23 5:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-24 6:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-24 6:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-24 7:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-24 7:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070501062554.GT25929@bingen.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thunder7@xs4all.nl \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.