All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] change global zonelist order v4 [0/2]
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 22:47:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070503224730.3bc6f8a8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070427144530.ae42ee25.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:45:30 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Hi, this is version 4. including Lee Schermerhon's good rework.
> and automatic configuration at boot time.

hm, this adds rather a lot of code.  Have we established that it's worth
it?

And it's complex - how do poor users know what to do with this new control?


This:

+ *	= "[dD]efault | "0"	- default, automatic configuration.
+ *	= "[nN]ode"|"1" 	- order by node locality,
+ *         			  then zone within node.
+ *	= "[zZ]one"|"2" - order by zone, then by locality within zone

seems a bit excessive.  I think just the 0/1/2 plus documentation would
suffice?


I haven't followed this discussion very closely I'm afraid.  If we came up
with a good reason why Linux needs this feature then could someone please
(re)describe it?

Thanks.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] change global zonelist order v4 [0/2]
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 22:47:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070503224730.3bc6f8a8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070427144530.ae42ee25.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:45:30 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Hi, this is version 4. including Lee Schermerhon's good rework.
> and automatic configuration at boot time.

hm, this adds rather a lot of code.  Have we established that it's worth
it?

And it's complex - how do poor users know what to do with this new control?


This:

+ *	= "[dD]efault | "0"	- default, automatic configuration.
+ *	= "[nN]ode"|"1" 	- order by node locality,
+ *         			  then zone within node.
+ *	= "[zZ]one"|"2" - order by zone, then by locality within zone

seems a bit excessive.  I think just the 0/1/2 plus documentation would
suffice?


I haven't followed this discussion very closely I'm afraid.  If we came up
with a good reason why Linux needs this feature then could someone please
(re)describe it?

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-04  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-27  5:45 [PATCH] change global zonelist order v4 [0/2] KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-04-27  5:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-04-27  6:04 ` [PATCH] change global zonelist order v4 [1/2] change zonelist ordering KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-04-27  6:04   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-04-30 16:12   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-04-30 16:12     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-04-27  6:17 ` [PATCH] change global zonelist order v4 [2/2] auto configuration KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-04-27  6:17   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-04-30 16:26   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-04-30 16:26     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-04  5:47 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-05-04  5:47   ` [PATCH] change global zonelist order v4 [0/2] Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 15:26   ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-04 15:26     ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-04 16:18     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 16:18       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 17:24       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-04 17:24         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-04 17:28         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 17:28           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 17:36           ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-04 17:36             ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-04 18:03             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 18:03               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 17:12   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-04 17:12     ` Lee Schermerhorn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070503224730.3bc6f8a8.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.